• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

CWXI Development League

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Mister Wright said:
[Hint mode]Colts are short of out-and-out pace bowlers.[hint mode off]
Colts also have a far bigger squad than other sides when Internationals etc happen.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
So it not the case that while 2 sides are struggling to raise 11 players, one side already has 14 to pick from, and now gets another player?
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
marc71178 said:
But that will surely still retain the squad sizes won't it!
Not if 2 for 1s happen.

EDIT: For example, Patrick traded for Kennett and Watt. :D
 

Travis_Teh

International Regular
bryce said:
Trading internationals perhaps..... :unsure:
Yeah.

3 clubs are in the same boat, why do people need to complain?
Don't see any of the blues complaining. The start of last season the blue camp lost it's top 5 players also, lost most the games, and didn't bicker.
 

Top