Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
Headley
Yeah, I took the coward's way out with Grace by excluding him from consideration as judging the 19th Century blokes as Test players is fraught. Ranji might be excluded on that basis too - his Test career was relatively brief and all his best work was done in the 19th Century as well. Trumper I'll definitely pick, though he's top 20 for me rather than top 10.Smith getting completely ignored is unexpected. ( Grace, Ranji, Trumper and Barry Richards.. Too )
No. I think the 9 selected so far is quite accurate and completely deserving of those places. So 10th looks right for Smith.Smith should be no lower than 7th tbh, to out him at 10th seems misleading somehow. Think Headley belongs in the top 10 though.
Headley
But you picked Sutcliffe.No. I think the 9 selected so far is quite accurate and completely deserving of those places. So 10th looks right for Smith.
Yes, the reason being personally I am not too sure how Smith will end up since it is apparently becoming quite difficult for him to pick up his 60+ averaging form again. But I will be content with him at 10th if everyone believes that he will become his old strong self again.But you picked Sutcliffe.