This is 100 percent true. I did another calculation and bradmans average is 70 odd with over 2000 runs.When considering the matches where bradmans score are removed from the team total.And calculating in the pitch where his team mates struggled .Only in those instances where the team got all out.That might very well hold for England, for Australia Bradman will completely skew this stat towards matches where he got out early. For most practical purposes, this is Bradman's average in matches where Bradman didn't score runs.
Agree with this. Should be Hutton, Smith, Headley imo7,8,9 imo should be-Headley,smith,Hutton (in no particular order).
Look at the length of Headley's career.I think all of Hammond, Gavaskar, and G.Chappell should be ahead of Headley and G.Pollock for having complete careers/good sample sizes
Yeah its just the sample size issue. Both Headley and Pollock were obviously still good enough to where they should be in like the top 15 and ahead of guys like border/miandad/ponting/sanga but Id have them just slightly behind Gavaskar, Hammond, G.Chappell.Look at the length of Headley's career.