Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Can't wait to see who this is.There is someone who is making the countdown who looks out of place though.
Can't wait to see who this is.There is someone who is making the countdown who looks out of place though.
I suppose one has to accept that batting has become far more audacious today than before. It's not merely smaller grounds, better bats and flatter pitches. The ability to negotiate pressure when chasing or willingness to take ariel route is much higher today. Adjusting for that in your mind is much harder than adjusting playing conditions.If older players have been pushed down by newer, current ones it'd be interesting to see how they'd go in another few years. Are people influenced by current performances and would the perspective given when current players have completed their careers influence the rankings, or do people simply rank more recent players higher because they are fresher in the memory (especially for younger guys like me)? Or does the continual acceleration in strike rates make people rank modern players higher, even though they wouldn't have been able to pull off such feats in 'the old days'?
Should start everyone as "Squad 1" and then filter them down?Let me in parallel try to form 4 teams as and when Nufan updates keeping their positions the same as much as possible. Hope it is fine for Nufan and others.
Squad 4: TBD, TBD, Greg Chappell, Javed Miandad
Squad 3: TBD, TBD, De Silva
Squad 2:
Squad 1:
Nah I get it as first team being the top players, second team being the next best, etc.Should start everyone as "Squad 1" and then filter them down?
Thought No 5 was too low for Aravinda. Depending on the make-up of the side, we can take a call if Aravinda can be the 12th man or gets a promotion to squad 3. Yes, right now thought of having 44 players and 4 subs in the 4 teams. As of now, no idea what to do with the remaining twoNah I get it as first team being the top players, second team being the next best, etc.
Surely one of these should just bat 5 in the 4th team though. Or be a reserve as each side will need a 12th man
True, but in general people don't apply the same logic to bowlers from that eraI suppose one has to accept that batting has become far more audacious today than before. It's not merely smaller grounds, better bats and flatter pitches. The ability to negotiate pressure when chasing or willingness to take ariel route is much higher today. Adjusting for that in your mind is much harder than adjusting playing conditions.
Give the 3rd and 4th squads 13 men to make it more even.Thought No 5 was too low for Aravinda. Depending on the make-up of the side, we can take a call if Aravinda can be the 12th man or gets a promotion to squad 3. Yes, right now thought of having 44 players and 4 subs in the 4 teams. As of now, no idea what to do with the remaining two
I think Aravinda gets slightly undervalued due to his career batting average. His performances at that 1996 World Cup is legendary - has anyone played a better World Cup Semi - World Cup Final double?
For Miandad, his batting strike rate can make you think twice about him IMO.
BTW, overall I like the list in general. There is someone who is making the countdown who looks out of place though.
Is Shakib the guy that Nufan is referring to?*****.. ppl have already voted FFS.. Stop campaigning for Shakib.
Would be hilarious if it was.Is Shakib the guy that Nufan is referring to?