honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Got owned in the 96 final though.
Negative impact still = impact. I meant to say his performances pretty much seemed to decide the game. And he did have dew to contend with in the 96 final, not that it is a big excuse. If anything, Warne was one player who always seemed to do better as the occasion got bigger. So most people will rate him higher than what his numbers suggest, rightly or wrongly depending on where you fall on the debate.