luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
Care to explain why?psxpro said:Ok, no offense to neil but I don't find it any better than the icc system.
Care to explain why?psxpro said:Ok, no offense to neil but I don't find it any better than the icc system.
He can't, he's banned.luckyeddie said:Care to explain why?
I think that your rankin system is perfect. It takes into account much more than the ICC ones.Neil Pickup said:After New Zealand miss out on the whitewash that would have maintained the status quo, they slip back fractionally and Sri Lanka progress a little.
1 Australia 1616
2 England 1062
3 South Africa 959
4 India 948
5 New Zealand 831
6 Pakistan 825
7 Sri Lanka 769
8 West Indies 485
9 Zimbabwe 270
10 Bangladesh 82
No please don't !!Sanz said:Can someone update the rankings please ?
They have to stop losing before the rankings agree.Jungle Jumbo said:Bangladesh > Zimbabwe
They're lower than they were - they still have a fantastically strong home record (only lost to Australia and England), and the rankings aren't built for snap changes based on form, you need a consistent change of fortunes, home and away, against everyone, to progress/regress significantly..silentstriker said:Why is SA so high, considering how much they've been losing?
Neil Pickup said:They have to stop losing before the rankings agree.