Botham's a good pick at this stage though. I was thinking of taking him if he'd fallen to my next selection. He gives you so much flexibility. He is a legitimate third quick, and despite what some reckon, he's good enough to bat at 6, especially if you have a good keeper/batsman at 7.And now I will have to wait for 2-3 days for my next turn
Surprisingly so many good players are available but I am damn sure that I will lose all good ones by the time my turn comes.
Thats what I have in my mind. Hopefully I'll be able to grab it.Botham's a good pick at this stage though. I was thinking of taking him if he'd fallen to my next selection. He gives you so much flexibility. He is a legitimate third quick, and despite what some reckon, he's good enough to bat at 6, especially if you have a good keeper/batsman at 7.
Haha yeah. "Arguably" would've been fair enough, but "undoubtedly" was a bit much.Punter being Australia's third best ever is highly debatable
Its a very good pick PEWS.Dale Steyn
Arguably still a bowler or two left who were better, but I do think his pace and aggression will compliment Hadlee far better than what the alternative new ball options would. He's the only bowler still available to have combined those talents with sustained excellence, so I think he's a must pick for me at this point. Really, really happy with my new ball combination since I finished it off in Round 5, after a lot of others.
1.
2.
3. Clyde Walcott
4. Sachin Tendulkar
5.
6.
7.
8. Richard Hadlee
9.
10. Dale Steyn
11. Bill O'Reilly
Harvey's third in my eyes (middle order only).Haha yeah. "Arguably" would've been fair enough, but "undoubtedly" was a bit much.
Don't really think you need the qualifier of middle order only - Bradman, Chappell, Ponting, Border, Harvey, Waugh and McCabe all come before the opening options anyway afaic.Harvey's third in my eyes (middle order only).