Most talented are Miller and Procter, the greatest is dependant on results and because pretty much every all rounder is different to the other (no all rounder offers the exact same thing as another) it's going to make comparisons even more subjective.
Purely on stats the top all rounders are sobers, Kallis, imran, Miller (in no order - extra weight given to tests). Sobers and Kallis are batting all rounders whereas the other two are bowling all rounders. None of them offer the same thing to any team so who is the greatest? It comes down to what we as individuals consider the more valuable skills and that's going to be different for all of us. That's what makes all rounder discussions so interesting.
Miller and sobers are possibly the truest all rounders of all. Miller because despite his test average he was as good a batsman as you could get and same as a bowler. Sobers because of his versatility.
Purely on stats the top all rounders are sobers, Kallis, imran, Miller (in no order - extra weight given to tests). Sobers and Kallis are batting all rounders whereas the other two are bowling all rounders. None of them offer the same thing to any team so who is the greatest? It comes down to what we as individuals consider the more valuable skills and that's going to be different for all of us. That's what makes all rounder discussions so interesting.
Miller and sobers are possibly the truest all rounders of all. Miller because despite his test average he was as good a batsman as you could get and same as a bowler. Sobers because of his versatility.