• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricketers that never added much to there team

Xuhaib

International Coach
Ramiz Raja.
An underrated act in the 92 World Cup maybe Saeed Anwar would have done a better job but he did his task efficiently also going through some cricinfo scorecards seemed to bat lengthy periods in match saving batting efforts in the late 80s and early 90s there is a reason Imran kept him in the side
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
<1 wicket per match and a batting average of 23.
I would guess he barely bowled for the first several years of his career. Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib, Saqqie, Mushtaq Ahmed, Razzaq and Azhar Mahmood were all often in the set up, the first 4 all ODI bowling legends. he wasn't really needed for anything other than his explosive batting which barely came off I'll give you

Once they moved on and he'd regularly get 10 overs he seemed to be always in the wickets - 9 ODI fivefers is the 3rd most ever
 
Last edited:

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I would guess he barely bowled for the first several years of his career. Wasim, Waqar, Shoaib, Saqqie, Mushtaq Ahmed, Razzaq and Azhar Mahmood were all often in the set up - he wasn't really needed for anything other than his explosive batting which barely came off I'll give you

Once they moved on and he'd regularly get 10 overs he seemed to be always in the wickets - 9 ODI fivefers seems like a lot to me
He's passable as a bowler but extremely minnow bashy and never did anything in ODI WCs. His batting is a non factor for me.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Without checking, going by the fact that when he did go big with the bat it was game breaking and the fact most 5fers in ODIs are match defining, I'd say he must very high up there for MOM awards
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I believe that had Getting taken that easy catch in Chennai on the 92 tour, we'd have been talking about Salisbury in the same hushed tones we use for Warne.
Perhaps it would have been something like this we’d be saying to each other?

[whispering] “Remember that wicket Salisbury took at Chennai?”
“Yeah!”
“Well, **** me he was **** after that, wasn’t he?”
“Absolutely!”
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
Hamish Rutherford scored a century on dayboo, and totally sucked after that.
Blair Pocock couldn't score a test century, got 6 50's but averaged under 23.
Dipak Patel had 66 innings and couldn't score a century, averaging only 20. With the ball he averaged 42.
Phil Tufnell averaged nearly 40 with the ball, taking less than 3 wickets a test, and of course was a complete chump with bat in hand.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hamish Rutherford scored a century on dayboo, and totally sucked after that.
Blair Pocock couldn't score a test century, got 6 50's but averaged under 23.
Dipak Patel had 66 innings and couldn't score a century, averaging only 20. With the ball he averaged 42.
Phil Tufnell averaged nearly 40 with the ball, taking less than 3 wickets a test, and of course was a complete chump with bat in hand.
Easier to say all NZ cricketers who debuted between 1928 and 1968 except 4.
 

Top