chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
Two down, one to go hopefully.
I agree that Ambrose>Marshall, but only by the thinest of margins. And I also feel the same about Murali>Saqlain (although Saqlain has a lower average and strike rate, Murali has a lower economy and has achieved over a much longer period of time).Ambrose>Marshall
Walsh>Srinath (you are missing the econony rate part which is equally important as average in ODIs and way more important than strike rate- And I guess even you would have taken Walsh if he were still available when you took Srinath)
Muralitharan>Saqlain
As much as I am a huge fan of AB, I really think putting him in an all time ODI side as a keeper is a bit much. He has only kept in 8 ODIs, (two of which have occurred since you chose him I think). And although I don't doubt that he could spank even the best bowlers of all time around in the powerplays, the pressure of opening the batting and keeping is immense and will almost certainly detract from him as a batsman.And about de Villiers, I grant your point about his keeping which is probably the only weakness in my team...He is probably as good a wicket-keeper as Dravid, till now...(Though I am very hopeful about him once Boucher retires, but that's another story)...But about his batting, I would say that I gave taken him for the powerplays beside a specialist opener in Haynes...He was great against McGrath and Lee, and I don't think any of the team here has got two better new-ball bowlers than them; so the point you made about his batting against new-ball bowlers is invalid according to me...Moreover, even he he fails sometimes (clearly I don't expect him to make 70 of 75 balls in every match), then I have an equally (in fact, more) great player for the powerplays, namely Ross Taylor...
Selecting Hodge was my one real blue. I'm thrilled to get Langer in the final round, and think Tait is a good pick given my bowling depth.As individuals Langer, Hodge and Tait arent bad selections for maybe one per team, but given this is an all time draft team can't see how your team will be valued that highly with all three. Some of the great One Day players otherwise imo.
Still he'll be a better batsman any day than any of the wicketkeepers left at that time (at the time of my selection)...And, it's not an all-time ODI side, it's one of the 14 all-time ODI sides...And de Villiers rightfully deserves his place there, and a huge (I mean really huge) number of players have been selected who are worse than de Villiers, probably at least one in every team...As much as I am a huge fan of AB, I really think putting him in an all time ODI side as a keeper is a bit much. He has only kept in 8 ODIs, (two of which have occurred since you chose him I think). And although I don't doubt that he could spank even the best bowlers of all time around in the powerplays, the pressure of opening the batting and keeping is immense and will almost certainly detract from him as a batsman.
Fave player combined with proven international class in Tests, plus comfort/experience in batting with Gilchrist from tests and WA, plus Langer's toughness and determination as a cricketer. With him, Waugh and to a degree Lamb, you know this team will never throw in the towel or think of themselves as beat. I rate that. Maher is good, but List A stats aside doesn't compare to Langer as an overall cricketer.Interesting selection of Langer and well Hodge.
The first thing I thought of when I saw Langer was Jimmy Maher and the fact that he was basically the player preferred to for both Langer and Hodge intially. Maher's List A record is as good if not better then Langer. Maher's ODI record is quite poor, but he hardly played as an opener. But for mine it hard to justifly someone selection based on List A stats, when someone with similar stats failed at ODI level during the same era. Though you could always argue Langer was better batsmen.
Atleast with West Indies guys who hardly played due to their strengh guys like Shaw and Clarke (in Tests) had brillant record in their limited chances. Though Hodge's record isn't that bad now I had a closer look at others.
There not that many openers of high quality left. But there still a couple with similar List A stats as Langer and pretty good ODI stats as well. Very interesting selection, but I guess the basic was him being a favorite player.
If Goughy and Corrin pick soon we could run through four picks quicky maybe more.
Dude, no need for apologies. It'd be boring if we all agreed, and anyway I myself find it difficult to make sense from that mess of colours and statistics in my posts.Yes mate going for the 12th man.
I like GIJ's team by the way. I do apologize questioning Morkel's selection as I said this without looking at the rest of your lineup. He didn't seem a very good selection until looking at your team and what you needed.
Haha it wasn't like a big apology because I felt like I hurt your feelings. Just I jumped the gun a bit when rubbishing Albie. He's a good number 7.Dude, no need for apologies. It'd be boring if we all agreed, and anyway I myself find it difficult to make sense from that mess of colours and statistics in my posts.
Well, you didn't get any chocolates or flowers to go with the apology. You're getting off lightly, mister.Haha it wasn't like a big apology because I felt like I hurt your feelings. Just I jumped the gun a bit when rubbishing Albie. He's a good number 7.