BoyBrumby
Englishman
To be fair tho, even if it is a phenomenon solely limited to Anglo cricketing nations it is still worthy of serious consideration. Cultural factors must play a part too; stronger extended familial bonds in the sub-continent off the top of my head!Slow Love™ said:From reading further, another issue is that the author seems to have left Asia out of his study (I'm not sure if the West Indies were included or not). Would this drag the percentages up, or down? They play an awful lot of cricket on the subcontinent. A focus on Anglo countries (at least, in terms of who's predominantly played the game in the countries he's mentioned - Australia, NZ, England and South Africa) suggests that far more may be at play than just cricket.
I don't have anything against such a finding - I'd probably just think "wow, that's heavy". I'm just not convinced that such a small number of deaths over the course of a century can tell us a great deal, particularly when whole swathes of cricket playing peoples are not included in the study.
I'm definitely gonna ask Santa for a copy!
