• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That's the standard MO though. Bit surprised you bothered with it tbh, despite how appropriate and proportionate your response to the stupidity of the post was.
IMO everyone should at least be treated as an adult. It's disrespectful the way most of this forum ignores and/or humours this guy as if he's the special kid in school you don't want to engage for fear of ruining discussion.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
None of HB's assumptions were anywhere near as stupid as someone assuming here that Jadeja would average 40+ with the ball last season or Pant doesn't belong to AT Border-Gavaskar XI ahead of Gilchrist.
Not that these comparisons are relevant at all, but yes, it was more stupid. In the former you're comparing a prediction involving guesswork (and a perfectly reasonable one that just ended up being wrong) with a claim that hindsight shows is evidently wrong. Not even in the same ballpark.

The latter comparison is even less relevant and is at best yet another "what about this" argument that I would disappointed to see my 6 year old nephew trot out. I'm assuming some Australian poster hurt your feelings by saying it at some point in the past but if it makes you feel better I think it's pretty clear that Pant has been much better than Gilchrist in Australia v India Tests
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Doesn't everyone have a wrist spin boner when it comes to bouncy Australian pitches?
Not sure but they shouldn't. Australia have barely played one (if at all?) in the last 10 years. Yasir Shah was supposed to be the best in the world and he was terrible. Imran Tahir was terrible. Since Warne & MacGill retired every leg spinner to play in Aus has been crap anyway. The successful spinners have been Lyon, Ashwin, Jadeja, Maharaj.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm assuming some Australian poster hurt your feelings by saying it at some point
Yeah I said it before the last series out here. h_hurricane is a delicate soul. As you say, comparing a prediction with something which has actually transpired is, well, odd to put it kindly. What's more, if you're wanting to say "series outcome would have been different if only X", it's probably not a great shout to use as your "only" the test where the other outfit declared twice.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Not sure but they shouldn't. Australia have barely played one (if at all?) in the last 10 years. Yasir Shah was supposed to be the best in the world and he was terrible. Imran Tahir was terrible. Since Warne & MacGill retired every leg spinner to play in Aus has been crap anyway. The successful spinners have been Lyon, Ashwin, Jadeja, Maharaj.
It still get perpetrated for some reason though. Warne trying to talk up Shah out here when he toured was so embarrassing it hurt your ear drums just listening. Probably the best wrist spinner to play out here since MacGill retired was Kuldeep, and he's mostly been a LO go-to rather than in tests, though he took 5-fer in the one test he played here in 2019.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not sure but they shouldn't. Australia have barely played one (if at all?) in the last 10 years. Yasir Shah was supposed to be the best in the world and he was terrible. Imran Tahir was terrible. Since Warne & MacGill retired every leg spinner to play in Aus has been crap anyway. The successful spinners have been Lyon, Ashwin, Jadeja, Maharaj.
I don’t think using Tahir as an example in Tests is good, considering how bad he is everywhere. Maybe as a how not to do it?
 

harsh.ag

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That Oz declaration was so terrible that it has invoked all these ridiculous arguments and name calling 7 years hence. Aus may have lost that match easily with better lower order batting from India in the last innings and they would have absolutely deserved it.

Most of TJB's frustration is simply down to the fact that Aus dominated that test and yet were so foolish they almost lost it.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That Oz declaration was so terrible that it has invoked all these ridiculous arguments and name calling 7 years hence. Aus may have lost that match easily with better lower order batting from India in the last innings and they would have absolutely deserved it.

Most of TJB's frustration is simply down to the fact that Aus dominated that test and yet were so foolish they almost lost it.
This post is largely correct. However the source of my frustration is mostly just from reading a really dumb comment.

You could be on to something though. Same as kiwis talking about the Brisbane test in 2001. "We could have won if only for x" while completely ignoring the plethora of extreme factors that went their way to even be in the game to start with. That kind of ignorance is definitely a trigger for me.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
tbf he would have if they just simply hit him back over his head.
Correct. Australia’s batting was very disappointing last series. It’s always embarrassing to lose a series at home, but when you lose wickets to slow bowlers not turning it, you’re doing batting completely wrong.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If Australia had have selected Pucovski at melbourne intsead of Burns they could have won the series 2-1. Langer's boner for out of form queensland openers cost Australia the series :ph34r:
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
If Australia had have selected Pucovski at melbourne intsead of Burns they could have won the series 2-1. Langer's boner for out of form queensland openers cost Australia the series :ph34r:
Don't think pucovski would have made a huge difference tbh. India won that game really comfortably, even 100 runs from to puc to burns's 1 run or whatever he made wouldn't have changed the result imo.
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
if there was a CW bingo card (now rtb or spikey to make this and get 7+ likes, as they should, because if they do it it'll be funny and incisive tbh) you would have at least, like, four bingo's from the last page and a half, ffs come on guys this is cookie cutter from all of you
 

Top