Well sure, but you have to be able to do that without distorting the balance of the ODI side, Jadeja adds genuine balance to the ODI side.Yeah Jadeja's ok for a number 7, you want someone who can score quicker than him ideally though.
Missed out 'at 6' from the end of my sentence tbf.Well sure, but you have to be able to do that without distorting the balance of the ODI side, Jadeja adds genuine balance to the ODI side.
Um.. your sentence never said "at 6" at any point, you must have edited it out beforehand and forgot? It says you last edited @ 3:01.Missed out 'at 6' from the end of my sentence tbf.
More about him being able to score away from home really. Definitely fine in home conditions at 7.Yeah Jadeja's ok for a number 7, you want someone who can score quicker than him ideally though.
I'm not talking about thursday, it's just in general. Rahane at 3 would be producing runs more often imo and Kohli would be better or at least just as useful at 4 compared to 3.Nah, Thursday was literally the perfect time for Kohli to come in 15 or so overs had past and India had a start. Was perfect for him to build his innings. He just ****ed up. It happens.
Where the **** were you when I was preaching this all throughout the tri series and copping flack from everyone you ****I'm not talking about thursday, it's just in general. Rahane at 3 would be producing runs more often imo and Kohli would be better or at least just as useful at 4 compared to 3.
NopeTaylor anyone?
I know, I meant to put it at the end and forgot itUm.. your sentence never said "at 6" at any point, you must have edited it out beforehand and forgot? It says you last edited @ 3:01.
I think I remember agreeing with youWhere the **** were you when I was preaching this all throughout the tri series and copping flack from everyone you ****