65 point penalty and relegation to division 2 would be fit. If that had have happened at Iford, Colchester or Southend, the Essex CEO would be saying we aren't taking cricket to outgrounds due to the poor pitches.I’m all for supporting Essex but can’t see how they can avoid a fine for that match.
Thank you. As you say, one hour of madness a couple days ago did for Hampshire. Without that, Kent would have probably have been beaten and we'd be looking at the weather forecasts for next week. Whatever my views on the matter, Surrey's strategy of batting deep was probably key to this, offsetting the subsequent absence of a proper spinner. Who'd have thought that Alec Stewart and Gareth Batty know more about these things than I do? Oh, and while I'm at it, kudos to young Lawes, who was our best bowler in the first innings here after I'd suggested that he should have been left out for a spinner.Congratulations @wpdavid. Surrey quite clearly the more complete team.
Really disappointing that one absolutely shocking innings has meant Hampshire could not take it to the last round. On the one hand I think the batting was just not good enough but then they could potentially end up winning 10 games which has got to be more than enough to win it in most seasons.
We're probably a mid-strength Div 1 side on paper. Relegation would be a disappointingly quick karmic rebalancing for us winning the title with a similarly mid-strength side last season.Warwickshire season has been bizarre they are a very good side
Kent have in theory the easier remaining game, at home too. The Hampshire win was huge though.A decent season for Kent in the end after a terrible start. Won a cup and look to be staying in div 1.
Something poetic in how, having spent the first half of the season conceding 500+ first innings scores to basically everyone, your big win came by skittling a title contender for 57.The Hampshire win was huge though.
Alex Davies looked a great signing but he hasn't been able to buy a run this season. Rob Yates hasn't had a great year either. And their bowling seems very dependent on Hannon-Dalby. Briggs and Brookes have taken their wickets at 43 and 52 respectively.Warwickshire season has been bizarre they are a very good side
Bowling attack has had a lot injuries. Liam Norwell was our attack leader last season but has missed most of this one. Miles and Sidebottom have both missed a lot of games. Then there are Woakes and Stone who've been more predictable absentees, but we'd usually expect to get at least a couple of games from each of them. Hannon-Dalby has stepped up better than I'd have expected, given all that.Alex Davies looked a great signing but he hasn't been able to buy a run this season. Rob Yates hasn't had a great year either. And their bowling seems very dependent on Hannon-Dalby. Briggs and Brookes have taken their wickets at 43 and 52 respectively.
What's Mark Stoneman up to these days?England could do a lot worse than recall Roland Jones.
Scoring plenty of runs opening for middlesexWhat's Mark Stoneman up to these days?
Fair enough. It's a bit disappointing that Brookes hasn't done better in that case. He has pace and isn't a complete newbie any more.Bowling attack has had a lot injuries. Liam Norwell was our attack leader last season but has missed most of this one. Miles and Sidebottom have both missed a lot of games. Then there are Woakes and Stone who've been more predictable absentees, but we'd usually expect to get at least a couple of games from each of them. Hannon-Dalby has stepped up better than I'd have expected, given all that.
Yeah Hampshire were one of those teams as well, made 650/6 against them earlier in the season.Something poetic in how, having spent the first half of the season conceding 500+ first innings scores to basically everyone, your big win came by skittling a title contender for 57.