You don't need 5 frontline bowlers.ave 35 with bat, no not really. Gone missing when it counts.
Root is competing with Smith at 4You don't need 5 frontline bowlers.
Also he gets in ahead of Khawaja even if you insist on 5 bowlers.
So it's ok to pick extra bowlers playing out of position but not ok to pick Root instead of Khawaja because Root has to be at 4?Root is competing with Smith at 4
What if hypothetically Smith was averaging 100 and Root 80?Root is competing with Smith at 4
Your first five batsmen do all the work, plus its my team.So it's ok to pick extra bowlers playing out of position but not ok to pick Root instead of Khawaja because Root has to be at 4?
lol you kid
Can't argue with thatYour first five batsmen do all the work, plus its my team.
Then Smith would have improved by 6% and Root by 230%What if hypothetically Smith was averaging 100 and Root 80?
Didn't Paine drop an absolute sitter, Vince I think at the Gabba? Then because Bairstow has been (marginally) the better of the two. I'm not exactly fussed either way though.Why have you gone with the second best keeper of the series?.
That's fair reasoning. One could even argue that you're picking Cummins for his batting anyway since he's been better than some batsmen.After two,
Warner
Stoneman (just beats Bancroft to this position but I'm not confident about the openers staying around long as both play their shots!)
Root (bugger has to play there whether he likes it or not)
Smith
S. Marsh
Bairstow+
Cummins (on our two test evidence the bloke is a bona fide all-rounder so I'm treating him as such.)
Starc (just beats Overton)
Lyon*
Hazlewood
Anderson
12th Man: Overton
I've had to resort to five bowlers based upon the premise of playing to one's strengths as the batting stinks. One alternative to this would be the removal of Starc and somebody like Malan, Bancroft or Paine being placed above Cummins. Either way...
What with Root's putting Australia in and England not following-on - not to mention Smith's generous declaration - both captains have been utterly awful so I've thrown the armband to Lyon for no other reason that he doesn't seem to be able to do anything wrong right now!
Cummins to replace Anderson for his batting. Anderson has only got wickets after the match has been decided.WarnerStonemanSmith (c)MalanS MarshM MarshBairstow (w/k)StarcLyonHazlewoodAndersonCummins (12th)
Nah Anderson has been significantly more effective than Cummins across the series. I expect that will change by the end of the tour though.Cummins to replace Anderson for his batting. Anderson has only got wickets after the match has been decided.
Feels about right at 7 Aussies to 4 Englishmen.Warner
Stoneman
Smith (c)
Malan
S Marsh
M Marsh
Bairstow (w/k)
Starc
Lyon
Hazlewood
Anderson
Cummins (12th)
Now you're just getting greedy.Cummins to replace Anderson for his batting. Anderson has only got wickets after the match has been decided.
I would have Cummins ahead of Anderson too tbh. Cummins has been consistently excellent without luck, Anderson has been consistently ordinary with a couple of wicket-taking spells when he's had the most assistance and at meaningless times of the game.Feels about right at 7 Aussies to 4 Englishmen.
Now you're just getting greedy.