Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Categorically not.Are you Richard in disguise??
Categorically not.Are you Richard in disguise??
I certainly wasn't "too stupid to notice that".Wait wasn't that a response to Richard's idiotic post ?
Or ping pong to lawn bowls as it were.That match was about as comparable to a modern ODI as The Ashes 1902 was to that of 2005.
Not saying they never have great innings (if they didn't they wouldn't become so good in the first place) but when they hit a century or take a five wicket haul its automatically amplified more than it probably should, at least compared to when a more average player does it.The best I've ever seen was Tendulkar's one at Sharjah, where he hit that straight six, like a lofted straight drive, perfection.
I think if he were, he is smart enough to change his game up and play the achor role. He wouldn't turn into Kallis or what have you, but he wouldn't be as flamboyant with his shots. He actually had a great S/R in the Ashes, and his overall S/R would probably be around 48-50 if he were Bangladeshi.I agree somewhat. I wonder what it would be like if KP was Bangladeshi.
Which, against McGrath, Clark and Warne, is pretty damn fast!Yeah, his Ashes 06/07 SR was around 50, I think.
Not Really. Tendulkar has 40 centuries now and not many do we really consider as all time great, same goes for guys like Ganguly, Anwar etc.Not saying they never have great innings (if they didn't they wouldn't become so good in the first place) but when they hit a century or take a five wicket haul its automatically amplified more than it probably should, at least compared to when a more average player does it.
Nah disagree. It might be amplified more by some of the more 'enthusiastic' fans, but if you look at the cricketing press or the opinions in most other countries, the feats of those on the subcontinent are denigrated and belittled on a regular basis. It's all about 'flat pitches', 'tiny grounds', 'doctored pitches', 'home advantage' etc etc.Not saying they never have great innings (if they didn't they wouldn't become so good in the first place) but when they hit a century or take a five wicket haul its automatically amplified more than it probably should, at least compared to when a more average player does it.
But how many of those who have been accused on here of late are actually guilty?Nah disagree. It might be amplified more by some of the more 'enthusiastic' fans, but if you look at the cricketing press or the opinions in most other countries, the feats of those on the subcontinent are denigrated and belittled on a regular basis. It's all about 'flat pitches', 'tiny grounds', 'doctored pitches', 'home advantage' etc etc.