superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Bl**dy hell Pratyush can you not give it a rest!
I understood your point, but you didn't understand mine, which is why I brought it up.Pratyush said:I had enough of this yesterday. But you kept bringing it up even though you understood it in the beginning as you say.
He has lost his sensesSudeep said:When? Quote me. Except for the comment I made to Liam's quote, which was just a childish remark a) to not tense Liam up, since he already said last few days have been pretty much like that and b) to indicate you that you're getting too serious with the arguement.
16 plus one university match for some not all teams. It used to be 17 - how is that 'much more' be aware of what you are talking about before you postPratyush said:Take a look at the English FC season. 18 plus many more versus universities etc. Used to be MUCH more in the past. be aware of the history of cricket before making such a remark.
The comment I made to Liam's quote is the senses one! Dude, seriously, read what I write before replying!Pratyush said:He has lost his senses
There was some thing other one.
Forget it. Arguement over.
We both have had enough of it. We have decided upon that.
Hooray!Pratyush said:Arguement over.
Hooray!Sudeep said:Arguement over.
I told everyone to stop Pratyush from making me mad. He went to the limits of making me mess my spellings.Adamc said:Hooray!
Hooray!
It's 'argument', BTW.
Earlier, in the early part of the 20th century players played MUCH more FC games. Regarding the current seasons I was in the impression that 10 teams per division - 18 FC games plus a few more, someof which are for FC games like the ones against Durham UCCE. Also a few tour FC games versus visiting countries though that number has reduced a lot too.superkingdave said:16 plus one university match for some not all teams. It used to be 17 - how is that 'much more' be aware of what you are talking about before you post
clap clap...Blewy said:Oh FFS get over it...
Your going on like a 2 year old without a dummy... Simple if you dont want to play dont play... If you do then pull your head in and let it go...
Some people just need to learn pull their heads in.....
I never made an issue of it. Sudeep dragged an msn convo on the forum. I didnt want to play the club cricket and I didnt come here first stating why.Blewy said:Your going on like a 2 year old without a dummy... Simple if you dont want to play dont play... If you do then pull your head in and let it go...
Some people just need to learn pull their heads in.....
I just teased an idea of posting the MSN convo here. And then you asked, in your owns words, for "the thread where I can criticize it". You could have quit from the argument if you wanted to. Just because I wanted to make a point clear with you, doesn't mean you've to argue.Pratyush said:I never made an issue of it. Sudeep dragged an msn convo on the forum. I didnt want to play the club cricket and I didnt come here first stating why.
Yes it is, because 37 a side wouldn't be cricketPratyush said:So we can change teams in our domestic league as we think it will benefit us over all. But we dont go on changing things of the Australian domestic structure putting more players in their domestic sides than realistically they would accept. Similarly we dont allow 37 players in each side. That is not an illogical arguement.
But it isn't realistic by definition.Pratyush said:What I brought may seem a small point but when we make the sim REALISTIC, we try to do that as much as possible and take it seriously and enjoy the fun of doing that.