• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Choose one pair : Ponting/Akram vs Sanga/Donald?

Choose one pair


  • Total voters
    20

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
But Op asks not to take it in to account. That means you have to rate him as a pure bat.

The issue is in what ever you put, he is a much greater cricketer than Ponting.

Then comes to Akram vs Donald who are pretty similar in their output in tests.
OP asks us to ignore his keeping, not to ignore his batting in games he was keeping in.
 

MasterBlaster24

Cricket Spectator
Was absolutely magnificent in 2 back to back World Cups
In 2000s kallis and sanga were similar kind of odi bats.Both played a anchor role in odis.
Both played out of context odi knocks more frequently. (Like 2003 sf 2007 sf 2015 qf- two of these inns knocked his team out of the wc.)
I rate sanga slightly above kallis in odis.It's because he had a better peak.From 2013 to 2015 sanga was one of the best odi batters in the world.(he smashed 11 out of his 25 odi centuries in this period and batted with a good sr as well). Comparing this to his career before 2013 which he was a massive ball eater(dot ball merchant) and a huge fvcker of own team's run rate.Even dilshan was a better odi bat than him imo.

Kallis and sanga's odi stats from from 1st of Jan 2000 to 1st Jan 2012 (more than 2 3rds sanga's career)

Kallis-avg 47 sr -74
Sanga-avg 38 sr-75

Avg in winning cause
Kallis-56
Sanga-42

Even kallis had a couple of chasing winning centuries as well.

As I said earlier they were n't poor odi batters at all.
I don't rate both of them highly as others in odis.
 
Last edited:

MasterBlaster24

Cricket Spectator
Exactly the case. It can be safely assumed that he would have averaged more if he never kept, especially it involved formative years.
I could make a similar argument for Abd.
Like the silly idea that his batting average would have improved if he kept more.

I think sanga gave up gloves when he was nearing the peak of his batting imo.
 

Top