Maison
Cricket Spectator - 1st Warning
Voltman said:Bad times? They had just thrashed Sri Lanka a couple of weeks back... South Africa are a good team.
oh nah, the love in the team was so high about 1 month ago....
Voltman said:Bad times? They had just thrashed Sri Lanka a couple of weeks back... South Africa are a good team.
And how long have you lived in Canada?honestbharani said:CC, did u actually see the footage?
6+ years.greg said:And how long have you lived in Canada?
No, which is why i am not commenting about Chappell- i am not stating whether it was malicious/accidental/fingest just stuck outside the window/whatever from Chappell.honestbharani said:CC, did u actually see the footage?
Well if that is true,then this is a non-incident. Like i said, i was addressing the notion that flipping the bird in a foreign culture is okay simply because 'out here its no biggie'....which is rather ignorant and insensetive to various cultures.honestbharani said:yeah, but he is saying that he was only attending to an injured finger inside the bus and that the cameras had caught what was a private thing inside the bus.
Still hurting from the Ashes then...SteveG said:Oh, you English are precious.
I keep forgetting your team is a shining light in a dark era of bad behaviour...sainthood must be just around the corner.
From my last two years in Singapore, I would say Australia isn't the only place.Buddhmaster said:I think the middle finger gesture is so meaningless now, that no one in Australia even does it anymore.
Which is why something done in private where noone ought to have been able to see it, and hence hurt by it (had the media not been so omnipresent), should not be thrown out of proportion.Pratyush said:Its a fact that Indian fans are very extreme in their reactions. Past experiences of the fans does show you have to be very professional (as you said) in reacting to crowds, media.
First of all, I agree Chapel didn't behave professionally, and I don't think he should have done it. But he did it for a reason that is quite understandable, and acceptable in my opinion, even though not entirely desirable. There's a difference in being justifiable and being acceptable. The crowd provocation was uncalled for and no matter how poorly they can act and be forgiven for it, they must not forget that they are Indians and not simply bengalis. The exclusion of Ganguly has shown that regional sentiments still override national interests, at least to an extent.shankar said:But saying that the crowd behaviour excuses his act is not right - The crowd doesnt get paid by the BCCI and is free to act as poorly as it wants. But Chappell is and hence should behave in a professional manner as required by the post he's occupying and shouldn't go down to the levels of the crowd.
If that's why he did it, then I don't see why not. If your finger hurts, you look at it, and don't stop to think whether the act might appear obscene to someone outside the bus who shouldn't be able to see it clearly.Pratyush said:Did Chappell have to attend to his finger by sticking it out of the team bus soon after boarding it?
If you're talking about acceptability, then yes there was nothing very serious or unacceptable about it. It just paints him in a very unfavourable light and shows him out to be hot-headed and immature, that's all.pug said:First of all, I agree Chapel didn't behave professionally, and I don't think he should have done it. But he did it for a reason that is quite understandable, and acceptable in my opinion, even though not entirely desirable. There's a difference in being justifiable and being acceptable. The crowd provocation was uncalled for and no matter how poorly they can act and be forgiven for it, they must not forget that they are Indians and not simply bengalis. The exclusion of Ganguly has shown that regional sentiments still override national interests, at least to an extent.
And so a level headed and mature way to react to a not-so-serious and perfectly acceptable incident is by making it hit media headlines and blow it into unnaturally huge proportions and let it affect your team composition? (ok, maybe for the last one I''m going a bit overboard since it hasn't by itself done anything yet, but it has all the potential)shankar said:If you're talking about acceptability, then yes there was nothing very serious or unacceptable about it. It just paints him in a very unfavourable light and shows him out to be hot-headed and immature, that's all.
Why do you keep repeating this tit-for-tat philosophy? Just because somebody else acted foolishly doesn't make Chappell's actions any less foolish.pug said:And so a level headed and mature way to react to a not-so-serious and perfectly acceptable incident is by making it hit media headlines and blow it into unnaturally huge proportions and let it affect your team composition? (ok, maybe for the last one I''m going a bit overboard since it hasn't by itself done anything yet, but it has all the potential)
-----
off topic: 100th post