Well then surely you would then know that such things are frowned upon in Indian culture moreso than Australian culture? Just imagine the reaction if you were to give the finger to someone at an Indian functon as opposed to one with majority Australians...the Australians might offer a mild rebuke whereas you and I both know that the Indians would be up in arms about it. It's a matter of the difference in how respect is shown in these cultures...and Chappell certainly crossed the line with his actions.shounak said:How is the bird more offensive in India then it is in Australia.. I'm 19 years old and despite being born in Australia have been going back to India every 3 years for minimum of a month.. I'd say I'd know quite a bit about Indian culture..
I truly fail to see how the bird is more offensive in India then Australia.. If anything, more people know what it is and what it implies in Aust then India..
Perhaps my awareness of Indian culture is not as acute as yours... or perhaps this "culture" is really a myth because there is no one, single culture that defines this nation as a whole. Then again, as I said, maybe I'm just ignorant. The public reaction to this diabolical act will make it pretty clear what our culture really is, as far as such matters are concerned...C_C said:No, massive cultural ignorance from the part of many here. Chappell is coaching India, not Australia. As such,his actions will be viewed from an Indian cultural perspective.
I am sure if someone impressed their cultural values on you ( say comes from a ***ually conservative culture and called most aussie women to be whores) you wouldnt take that as an insignificant comment.
Marto's reaction was to the media and it was done in a joking, almost approval seeking manner. There was no malice there. He had a smile on his face whilst doing it.. But anyway, a coach and a non-senior (ie not captain or vice) players standard of behaviour are completely different..Dasa said:I remember Damien Martyn giving the finger to a journalist which was captured on camera..the reaction, although disapproving, was mild and it was forgotten about pretty quickly. Now look at the Indian reaction. Surely the fact that it has gotten so much attention and is so widely reported shows that many more people have been offended by Chappell's indiscretion, which reflects on the culture.
Yeah, and he wanted everyone else to attend to it to.He was only attending to the finger in the team bus
I don't see why one should automatically ridicule such an explanation. Try biting your fingernails - when you get on to your index finger it would probably be pretty easy to capture a photograph suggesting something more "sinister".Isolator said:Yeah, and he wanted everyone else to attend to it to.
"Attend to this, ************s!"
The Kolkatans aren't all national coaches. You should have a thick enough skin to take it in stride; it comes with the job.parttimer said:Well maybe the Kolkatans shouldn't have burned an effigy of him, that might have offended HIS 'cultural sensitivities'.
Voltman said:Or an Eastern European gymnastics coach.sqwerty said:If you don't want to be fingered now and again......don't get an Australian coach.
Agreed. I thought that was some of my finest work. If a little subtle...andyc said:
I can't believe this has gone unnoticed.
Who the hell is justifying the effigy burning by the Kolkata fans?parttimer said:Well maybe the Kolkatans shouldn't have burned an effigy of him, that might have offended HIS 'cultural sensitivities'.
Make that one more person. Gosh, what I've seen in delhi schools is that little kids not even in class 6th (about 11 yrs) pop up their middle fingers when irritated at someone. With wrestling and all, middle finger has inculcated itself into the neo indian culture, at least in the metros.Dasa said:So you choose to believe ONE person over several others who disagree??
I doubt if being booed for doing well by your own countrymen was ever part of the job description. I agree he didn't show much professionalism, but neither did the Kolkata crowd deserve any.Pratyush said:Coming to the job - one should understand whatever else comes along with a job. If some one does not he is likely to get into unnecessary controversies.
I would say his tiff with ganguly is the main reason why he will get into unneccessary controversies. He's got some powerful and influential people against him and all they are looking for s a reason to shoot him. Saying which, someone should have told him that, which I presume they did, and for him to show his middle finger like that could only mean a) that he was super ****ed and couldn't control it, b) he thought it wouldn't be visible and so only a personal way off letting off steam without hurting anyone or c) he didn't care.Pratyush said:If some one does not he is likely to get into unnecessary controversies.
I wish. This "diabolical act" will just give the pro ganguly and anti chapell party a stronger case to fight with.Isolator said:The public reaction to this diabolical act will make it pretty clear what our culture really is, as far as such matters are concerned...
Oh, you English are precious.marc71178 said:Is it any wonder so many people don't like the Australian team then?
I totally agree.pug said:I doubt if being booed for doing well by your own countrymen was ever part of the job description. I agree he didn't show much professionalism, but neither did the Kolkata crowd deserve any.