As for our keeper situation, there's two other options I can think of.
Uday Kaul | India Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo - Uday Kaul. Decent FC record but I'm not sure about his keeping ability. Maybe someone who watches Indian domestics can testify?
Naman Ojha | India Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo - Naman Ojha. Once again dunno about his keeping ability. Has a 200 in domestics though.
Naman Ojha, of these two. Yes, he's only had one season and the knokcouts of the previous in the Elite league, but he's pulled his team out of Plate league mediocrity and has performed significantly better in the last ftwo seasons.
Good wicketkeeper, adequate striking power (but can't score 70-ball centuries or 31-ball golds or hit eight sixes even once) and can regularly get you centuries (but don't expect regular 150+ scores), and hold his own behind the stumps. Let's just hope they don't make him captain.
Kaul, on the other hand, is still raw, and sometimes does not keep wickets. Better options are at hand. Ojha's the one to choose. Far better than Patel/Saha and slightly ahead of Dinesh Karthik, at present.
===========================================
Outside of that, let's not make too many youthful changes in the Indian side. Blooding too many youngsters may leave the side bleeding a little too soon, too often. Sri Lanka threw aside a lot of their old players after the dreadful 1999 World Cup, and started losing series after series, even at home, and had to call back their oldies soon. A similar tale unfolded after the less disappointing 2003 World Cup, with their youngsters failing and seniors phased back in. Pakistan cleaned up their team of anyone experienced after the 2003 World Cup, and when they too started losing tournaments, had more or less all the players thrown out, back in the side (bar Wasim, Waqar and Anwar).
India's attempts at giving the youth a chance have been unsuccessful. They tried a very, very young team in Zimbabwe. They ended up with egg on their faces, also known as losing both games to Zimbabwe and dropping out of the tri-series. Another case of grooming a youngster backfired horribly when Unadkat represented the country in a Test match in South Africa, tamely surrendered to the home side. Even now, there's daylight between an ageing batting core and the so-called promising young batsmen.
Rather, they need to pick teams on athleticism and fitness, not age. Badrinath is over thirty, but one of the fittest cricketers in India, and is much better on the field than most twenty-somethings playing for India. Pankaj Singh is no slouch on the field either, nor is the much-mocked Vinay Kumar. Pick a team of eleven good fielders, without looking at age certificates, and you have something capable of winning.
