Groundking
International Debutant
This, Drop Vince, everybody up a slot, Foakes in at no.7, Overton out when Stokes gets back, with Stokes batting no.6 and Moeen 7/8 (depending on how Foakes does with the bat).Now for Root to bat 3
This, Drop Vince, everybody up a slot, Foakes in at no.7, Overton out when Stokes gets back, with Stokes batting no.6 and Moeen 7/8 (depending on how Foakes does with the bat).Now for Root to bat 3
Its a valid argument in tests if your tail ain’t scoringI don't think I've ever seen anyone make the 'Batting higher means a batsman will score more runs' argument before. Atleast not for Test cricket, it's a somewhat valid argument in ODIs and T20s.
Ha, no argument.It’s also a valid argument if the bloke is better than two fellas batting above him.
I’ve got literally no idea what this means and why you quoted me...
England v West Indies, 3rd Test, Edgbaston, 4th day: Denesh Ramdin regrets attack on Viv Richards | Cricket | ESPN CricinfoI’ve got literally no idea what this means and why you quoted me...
Vince is on the chopping board IMO, would not be surprised to see him gone if we lose this test, with 2 free hits to whoever comes in, then a reassessment when Stokes become available again.Malan century. now what?
He could qualify as a Kiwi.What if Stokes is never available again?
Or if he’s found guilty, as an Aussie.He could qualify as a Kiwi.
Probably get a game with us after MMarsh retires.Or if he’s found guilty, as an Aussie.