Can you beat for the cricket guru title?

[aussie tragic]

1. Ponting
2. Dravid
3. Lara
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Trescothick
6. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
7. Mohammad Yousuf
8. Tendulkar
9. Vaughan
10. Thorpe

6 names correct, only 2 in correct position

 

[Jamee999]

1. Dravid
2. Ponting
3. Hayden
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara
6. Tendulkar
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Inzamam
9. Trescothick
10. Vaughan

 

[aussie tragic]

1. Dravid
2. Ponting
3. Hayden
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara
6. Tendulkar
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Inzamam
9. Trescothick
10. Vaughan

Still only 7 correct; 3 in correct position.
Guys, nominate 2 people at a time in their correct position and I'll give them to you.

 

[oz_fan]

1. Ponting
2. Dravid
3. Hayden
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara
6. Tendulkar
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Gibbs
9. Sangakkara
10. Jayawardene

 

[aussie tragic]

1. Ponting
2. Dravid
3. Hayden
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara
6. Tendulkar
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Gibbs
9. Sangakkara
10. Jayawardene

9 correct; 4 in right position

 

[oz_fan]

Ponting (1)
Dravid (2)

 

[aussie tragic]

I'll give you the 4 that Oz_fan had in the correct position:

1.
2.
3.
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6.
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8.
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10.

btw, all ten names have now been mentioned in previous posts.

 

[aussie tragic]

Ponting (1)
Dravid (2)

I'm sure no-one is surprised they're both in top 10, both in wrong order here.

 

[oz_fan]

Hayden (1)
Ponting (2)
Dravid (3)
Tendulkar (8)

 

[Goughy]

1. Dravid Hayden
2. Ponting
3. Dravid
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6. Trescothick
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Tendulkar
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10. Mohammad Yousuf

 

[aussie tragic]

1. Dravid Hayden
2. Ponting
3. Dravid
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6. Trescothick
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Tendulkar
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10. Mohammad Yousuf

8 correct and all of them in their correct position, assuming No. 1 is meant to be Matthew Hayden and not Dravid Haydon

 

[aussie tragic]

Hayden (1)
Ponting (2)
Dravid (3)
Tendulkar (8)

Only 3 of 4 correct, so no table update

 

[oz_fan]

1. Hayden
2. Ponting
3. Dravid
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6. Gibbs
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Jayawardene
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10. Yousuf

 

[aussie tragic]

1. Hayden
2. Ponting
3. Dravid
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6. Gibbs
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Jayawardene
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10. Yousuf

9 correct, 8 in right position

 

[oz_fan]

Hayden (1)
Ponting (2)
Dravid (3)
Jayawardene (8)
Gibbs (10)

 

[aussie tragic]

I think the top 3 are now pretty obvious, so new table:

1. Hayden: 7065 runs @ 56.07
2. Ponting: 6700 runs @ 64.42
3. Dravid: 6351 runs @ 63.51
4. Kallis: 6184 runs @ 62.46
5. Lara: 5932 runs @ 52.49
6.
7. Langer: 5691 runs @ 49.06
8. Jawawardene: 5317 runs @ 50.63
9. Sangakkarra: 4796 runs @ 48.93
10. Gibbs: 4759 runs @ 47.59

 

[aussie tragic]

Hayden (1)
Ponting (2)
Dravid (3)
Jayawardene (8)
Gibbs (10)

All correct, well done (I'll amend post above), just leaves No. 6??

 

[Dasa]

All correct, well done (I'll amend post above), just leaves No. 6??

Trescothick - 5815 runs @ 44.38.

 

[aussie tragic]

Trescothick - 5815 runs @ 44.38.

Correct. You snuck in at the end Dasa after Oz-Fan did most of the work

 

[Dasa]

Correct. You snuck in at the end Dasa after Oz-Fan did most of the work

oz_fan or anyone with a good question can go ahead, I can't think of a question right now.