Always happy to see you!Is that a kirpan in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?
Its true, but hands up all the people who have, or have thought of purchasing VB since hearing about this event. Anyone? But its a subconscious thing they say..VB are getting far more publicity out of Ahmed not wearing the logo than they would if he did wear it.
Are you assuming he meant back to Pakistan or to his cozy 2 bedroom apartment in Melbourne?Telling him to go home is worse than "over the top". Its downright disgusting.
Yeah this is actually a point I've struggled with in the last day. What does he actually mean?Are you assuming he meant back to Pakistan or to his cozy 2 bedroom apartment in Melbourne?
hands up all the people who have, or have thought of purchasing VB since they started sponsoring the team
I haven't drank VB for years, nor even thought about the brand. But all of a sudden the VB name is everywhere and as they say, there's no such thing as bad advertising.Its true, but hands up all the people who have, or have thought of purchasing VB since hearing about this event. Anyone? But its a subconscious thing they say..
I have seen them wearing them downtown Vancouver which has a massive sikh population. But have never seen one live unsheathed (drawn out).Serious question - have you actually seen someone's kirpan? I have Sikh friends and have never seen theirs for at least one fairly obvious reason.
How much did VB pay to have their stupid ****ing logo on the team uniform? Anybody? So its important to someone.theres not really much to respond to. it's just a stupid ****ing logo.
Fawad its worth, I disagree that there is no such thing as bad advertising. There is so much bad advertising, there is some good too.I haven't drank VB for years, nor even thought about the brand. But all of a sudden the VB name is everywhere and as they say, there's no such thing as bad advertising.
Well in this case it's as people have said, there aren't enough Muslims around the team for it to become an issue for the sponsors, so they can object.To play devil's advocate slightly, why are religious objections to advertising logos treated as a separate category to other, some might argue more salient, disinclinations to wearing them?
If folk what to go to whatever building of their choice and talk to their invisible chum (or chums for polytheists), that's all good but should they qualify for special treatment? What if, say, Chris Rogers was a CAMRA member and objected to a VB logo on the (reasonable) grounds that it's macro brewed pisswater? Should he be excused too?
The " There's no such thing as bad advertising" expression is of course from a seller's perspective. In this case VB'sFawad its worth, I disagree that there is no such thing as bad advertising. There is so much bad advertising, there is some good too.
Did Khawaja wear a VB logo when he played? I must admit I didn't notice. Not even sure if the test kit has one on anyway.
I don't actually know if he's Muslim, tbf, but as he took his maiden bow in Pakistan there's a sporting chance he was born into the faith even if he's not an adherent.