Broad Replaces Lewis

[Scaly piscine]

True, I have the excuse near enough every day.

Yep, the excuse is that you're allowed to get away with whatever you like.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Well, it's not so much a good move as a required one as Lewis has family matters to attend to. Lewis is infinitely better than Broad at one day cricket at this stage though, so it's an unfortunate occurance if anything.

England could actually draw a positive out of it though - the management were reluctant to play Lewis for whatever stupid reasons, and they might - just might - be more inclined to play Broad. Lewis is better than Broad, yes, but they're both better than Mahmood, so Broad being there could actually help matters.

Yea. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Broad plays at some point without there being any further injuries. The tall bowlers I can think of seem to be doing well (McGrath, Oram, Rankin) - obviously you'd expect there to be some success with those three anyway.

 

[The Baconator]

Prefer it explained this way tbh.

 

[Jamee999]

*dances*

 

[Ash_A55]

The tall bowlers I can think of seem to be doing well (McGrath, Oram, Rankin)

Rankin has been rather impressive this world cup. Even to be named in the same category as McGrath and Oram is a testament to his sucess.

 

[vic_orthdox]

But Jack edited it...

I only edited it because Rodgie put into "code" in his opening post, which meant you had to scroll across sideways to read the whole article, and you couldn't read it without doing so - which was a pain in the neck. I only re-adjusted it because it was more convenient.

 

[open365]

I'm disapointed Lewis didn't get a game tbh, Saj has done ok i know but Lewis didn't do anything apart from picking up an injury that deserved to get him dropped.

 

[AussieDominance]

Prefer it explained this way tbh.

I like it when you can read an article without spelling mistakes.

" He will be replaced by Leicestershire"?s" Stuart Broad."


?

 

[The Baconator]

I like it when you can read an article without spelling mistakes.

" He will be replaced by Leicestershire"?s" Stuart Broad."


?

Oi. Word's mistake not mine

 

[Richard]

Yep, the excuse is that you're allowed to get away with whatever you like.

Keep thinking that, chum(p), does you good to believe everything's set-up in favour of certain things, patently.

 

[Richard]

Oi. Word's mistake not mine

More a case of the incompatibility between Word and Berita than the fault of Word, ITBT.

 

[Richard]

I only edited it because Rodgie put into "code" in his opening post, which meant you had to scroll across sideways to read the whole article, and you couldn't read it without doing so - which was a pain in the neck. I only re-adjusted it because it was more convenient.

I know, it's just funny to see Rodgie trying to be the latest thing he's trying to be and you (twice in a few hours) editing his posts.

 

[AussieDominance]

I know, it's just funny to see Rodgie trying to be the latest thing he's trying to be and you (twice in a few hours) editing his posts.

You get so easily amused.

 

[Richard]

Indeed I do. I find many things funny.

 

[AussieDominance]

I find it funny how I am a better writer than you.

 

[Richard]

I find it funny that you are convinced of that despite me being a CW writer and you not being...

 

[AussieDominance]

I find it funny that you are convinced of that despite me being a CW writer and you not being...

CW Writing is nothing special tbh. And some people don't always want to be writer's I wanted to be a Content Updater not a writer.

 

[Richard]

Then why are you crowing about your writing being superior to mine?

And, indeed, why are you trying to write thread-starting posts akin to CW news items?

 

[pasag]

I find it funny how I am a better writer than you.

But you didn't write that.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Haha why does every thread involving Rodgie turn into a terrible slanging match? Just talk cricket or something.