Personally I think Afridi wipes the floor with both of them in terms of natural hitting ability... In terms of the most brilliant, elegant & excellent batsmen ive seen... hmm... Lara, Tendulkar, Dravid, Langer, Vaughan, Richie Richardson all come to mind....FaaipDeOiad said:For hitting ability, Gilchrist is easily the best I've ever seen, and possibly one of the best of all time, and Kluesener also rates a mention.
There's a difference for me between being able to slog sixes and being a good hitter. Though of course, Afridi is both, Gilchrist is the cleanest and most controlled striker of the ball I've ever seen. When he's at his very best, he can hit an 80 ball century in a test match with most of the field on the fence without giving a chance, and make it look easy. There's certianly plenty of batsmen who have been bigger and stronger hitters than Gilchrist, but none of them have been as successful in the way they did it.hindsy said:Personally I think Afridi wipes the floor with both of them in terms of natural hitting ability... In terms of the most brilliant, elegant & excellent batsmen ive seen... hmm... Lara, Tendulkar, Dravid, Langer, Vaughan, Richie Richardson all come to mind....
Exactly - if you told Gilchrist he wasn't allowed to hit sixes, he'd still be capable of scoring 70-80 ball centuries; with Afridi, you'd have to doubt his ability to find the gaps.FaaipDeOiad said:There's a difference for me between being able to slog sixes and being a good hitter. Though of course, Afridi is both, Gilchrist is the cleanest and most controlled striker of the ball I've ever seen. When he's at his very best, he can hit an 80 ball century in a test match with most of the field on the fence without giving a chance, and make it look easy. There's certianly plenty of batsmen who have been bigger and stronger hitters than Gilchrist, but none of them have been as successful in the way they did it.
Has there ever been a more relaxed bloke at the crease? He plays like it's backyard cricket on Christmas Day. No fear. No hesitation. I think much of that stems from the fact that batting is the second string to his bow, and that his place in the side is not dependent on it (at least not wholly anyway).Barney Rubble said:Exactly - if you told Gilchrist he wasn't allowed to hit sixes, he'd still be capable of scoring 70-80 ball centuries; .
I'd agree with that - he bats like a bowling all-rounder who knows he can play his shots because runs are a bonus.howardj said:Has there ever been a more relaxed bloke at the crease? He plays like it's backyard cricket on Christmas Day. No fear. No hesitation. I think much of that stems from the fact that batting is the second string to his bow, and that his place in the side is not dependent on it (at least not wholly anyway).
Afridi?hindsy said:Personally I think Afridi wipes the floor with both of them in terms of natural hitting ability... In terms of the most brilliant, elegant & excellent batsmen ive seen... hmm... Lara, Tendulkar, Dravid, Langer, Vaughan, Richie Richardson all come to mind....
Any International batsman who doesnt wear a thigh pad, is a man to be respected.Slow Love™ said:Carl Hooper - yeah, so he didn't live up to his potential and often threw his wicket away. But on song, he was glorious. I really had a lot of time for this guy, and it was quite depressing that internal politics caused the end of his international career (for the second, and seemingly final time), when he really seemed to be enjoying his cricket and was showing more consistency.
Thats something I can never do, and I've been trying for years andyears to achieve. Complete power over a shot played late as hell. Amazing, truly amazing.Pratyush said:Inzamam - always amazes me how late he plays the ball