Rik
Cricketer Of The Year
Nope I don't Think the decision to recall Hooper was a bad one, I Thought it was. There is a difference.R_Powell_fan said:Sorry Rik....... but the the sentence " ......is just as bad as ...." certainly implies you think the decision to recall Hooper was a bad one and the recent one regarding Lara is worse...try to phrase you ideas better.....not that mine are that well phrased
Well you think "Hooper did a fine job" but his capatainacy record is just as bad as Lara's.....how come. Also, the decision to bring back Hooper was based on Merit and Experience as he came back, played in the Busta Cup and got an increadbile 960 odd runs in the 9 matches played......Also he had lots of experience so he got the captainacy....
I think Hooper did a good job because near the end of his stint the West Indies were becoming a creditable force again, when he started it they looked like they were going to continue their decline. These things take time.
He got picked but just giving him the captaincy smacked of a lack of vision by the selectors, they need a long term candidate so why keep giving it to players who will not be there in 5 years time? Giving it to Lara who failed before shows that lack of vision with the Selectors. Why not have a gamble, try someone else younger? South Africa did...
Last edited: