I like this. Now we have reply by poetry .SJS said:Harmison rules - so you say
Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
don't you think
he's yett too 'pink'
to be your 'Titan' this a way ?
I like this. Now we have reply by poetry .SJS said:Harmison rules - so you say
Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
don't you think
he's yett too 'pink'
to be your 'Titan' this a way ?
Poetry's loverly, dear old chapJASON said:I like this. Now we have reply by poetry .
25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!marc71178 said:In the context of that match it was.
And it's still an average of 25 runs per wicket - you're saying that's not special?
Now it's time for me firmly to saySJS said:Harmison rules - so you say
Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
don't you think
he's yett too 'pink'
to be your 'Titan' this a way ?
Don't think anyone is saying it's one of his best performances, another day at the office where Harmy "didn't bowl very well" by his own admission. 7 wickets at 1.7 runs each, there's a good performance.SJS said:25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!
SJS said:Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
Erm, 8-202 when the match averaged about 40 runs per wicket...SJS said:25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!
It's the difference between winning and losing - and to put it in perspective, how did New Zealand bowl in the fourth innings? Or had the wicket just suddenly flattened out?marc71178 said:Erm, 8-202 when the match averaged about 40 runs per wicket...
That is a good performance.
2005 - arranged for some years now.koch_cha said:when is the next ashes series!!!!
Englnad should try to held it early they have the best fast bowler
in the world now.Aussie will least want to face him
thats y i asked them to change it for a changeluckyeddie said:2005 - arranged for some years now.
England tend to keep to their prearranged schedule.
*cough*bangladesh tour*cough*
Actually, what we need to do is keep Harmison fit for another year. He cannot be expected to beat Australia single-handedly. Jones has a lot of work to do to become a reliable old ball bowler of considerable pace, and either Anderson or Hoggard needs to step up a gear, and neither of those is going to happen overnight. If we could arrange to do all that and find a decent spin-bowler as well, then we might have a reasonable chance come next summer.koch_cha said:thats y i asked them to change it for a changeOriginally Posted by luckyeddie
2005 - arranged for some years now.
England tend to keep to their prearranged schedule.
*cough*bangladesh tour*cough*
its a matter of doing something for the first time in 17 years![]()
![]()
![]()
[Cynic] Hard not to make a huge improvement when you're as appalling as he wasluckyeddie said:I've not seen many English bowlers show such a staggering improvement in such a short period of time.
This rubbish is going to run and run, I can tell.Langeveldt said:[Cynic] Hard not to make a huge improvement when you're as appalling as he was[/Cynic]
Hope I didnt cause Eddie to do a runner...luckyeddie said:This rubbish is going to run and run, I can tell.
I'll see you folks in a few weeks - back to lurking mode
What, like winning a series outside Asia?koch_cha said:thats y i asked them to change it for a change
its a matter of doing something for the first time in 17 years![]()
![]()
![]()
Not you particularly - but of late it's become a bit of a cultural desert. I'll still be around - might even chip in once in a while if the collective IQ in certain quarters makes it back above that of a lamellibranch.Langeveldt said:Hope I didnt cause Eddie to do a runner...
I was missing not having Riks input in these here parts![]()