• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Bradman vs The others

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
SJS said:
Harmison rules - so you say
Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
don't you think
he's yett too 'pink'
to be your 'Titan' this a way ?
I like this. Now we have reply by poetry .
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
JASON said:
I like this. Now we have reply by poetry .
Poetry's loverly, dear old chap
Say it well, we'll stand and clap
But class of new members
and ass of new members
For heavens sake, avoid such crap !!
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
marc71178 said:
In the context of that match it was.

And it's still an average of 25 runs per wicket - you're saying that's not special?
25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The Kiwis be ranked number three
On the first day, come time for tea
They were looking quite good
Just like Flem thought they would
But by Monday, Nass was full of glee

Should the Kiwis be talked of as poor,
The cricket world be flawed to the core
For they are hard to beat
And did not meet defeat
At the hands of Ganguly or Warne
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
SJS said:
Harmison rules - so you say
Kiwis ? 'cause they struggle to play
don't you think
he's yett too 'pink'
to be your 'Titan' this a way ?
Now it's time for me firmly to say
that I really don't think you can read.
I did not say he rules -
just the best we have got.
Now my rhyming has gone on the blink.

He destroyed the West Indies in three
test matches, the first three that is,
of the islands this spring
and despite what you say
that's more than the others were able to do at the time.

Now look what you've done, SJS.
My scanning had gone now as well.
If I take a deep breath
and I think about it,
I might get it back - there it is.

So Harmison's form is a dream
and that's why he's there - in the team.
Number two in the world
in the rankings unfurled.
Harmison, like my rhymes, back on-stream.
 

twctopcat

International Regular
SJS said:
25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!
Don't think anyone is saying it's one of his best performances, another day at the office where Harmy "didn't bowl very well" by his own admission. 7 wickets at 1.7 runs each, there's a good performance.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
SJS said:
25 runs per wicket is fine as a career average. It is nothing if you consider it one of your best performances !!
Erm, 8-202 when the match averaged about 40 runs per wicket...

That is a good performance.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
marc71178 said:
Erm, 8-202 when the match averaged about 40 runs per wicket...

That is a good performance.
It's the difference between winning and losing - and to put it in perspective, how did New Zealand bowl in the fourth innings? Or had the wicket just suddenly flattened out?
 

biased indian

International Coach
when is the next ashes series!!!!
Englnad should try to held it early they have the best fast bowler
in the world now.Aussie will least want to face him
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
koch_cha said:
when is the next ashes series!!!!
Englnad should try to held it early they have the best fast bowler
in the world now.Aussie will least want to face him
2005 - arranged for some years now.
England tend to keep to their prearranged schedule.

*cough*bangladesh tour*cough*
 

biased indian

International Coach
luckyeddie said:
2005 - arranged for some years now.
England tend to keep to their prearranged schedule.

*cough*bangladesh tour*cough*
thats y i asked them to change it for a change
its a matter of doing something for the first time in 17 years :D :D :D
 

badgerhair

U19 Vice-Captain
koch_cha said:
Originally Posted by luckyeddie
2005 - arranged for some years now.
England tend to keep to their prearranged schedule.

*cough*bangladesh tour*cough*
thats y i asked them to change it for a change
its a matter of doing something for the first time in 17 years :D :D :D
Actually, what we need to do is keep Harmison fit for another year. He cannot be expected to beat Australia single-handedly. Jones has a lot of work to do to become a reliable old ball bowler of considerable pace, and either Anderson or Hoggard needs to step up a gear, and neither of those is going to happen overnight. If we could arrange to do all that and find a decent spin-bowler as well, then we might have a reasonable chance come next summer.

And if Harmison can't maintain his standard for more than a season, he's another tedious mirage and it doesn't matter anyway because we're screwed.

Cheers,

Mike
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
luckyeddie said:
I've not seen many English bowlers show such a staggering improvement in such a short period of time.
[Cynic] Hard not to make a huge improvement when you're as appalling as he was :ph34r: [/Cynic]
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Langeveldt said:
[Cynic] Hard not to make a huge improvement when you're as appalling as he was :ph34r: [/Cynic]
This rubbish is going to run and run, I can tell.

I'll see you folks in a few weeks - back to lurking mode
 

Langeveldt

Soutie
luckyeddie said:
This rubbish is going to run and run, I can tell.

I'll see you folks in a few weeks - back to lurking mode
Hope I didnt cause Eddie to do a runner...

I was missing not having Riks input in these here parts :)
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
To find out the answers to all the questions in this thread..and more have a look at the "A League For The Ages 2" Sub-forum and take what you gather

P.S Support the Basin Reserve Bears. :P
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Langeveldt said:
Hope I didnt cause Eddie to do a runner...

I was missing not having Riks input in these here parts :)
Not you particularly - but of late it's become a bit of a cultural desert. I'll still be around - might even chip in once in a while if the collective IQ in certain quarters makes it back above that of a lamellibranch.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I don't think Lara has struggled any more than all the other modern day great batsmen when it comes to tough pitches......That is the reason they are called tough pitches, because batsmen, even the ones as good as Lara, struggle on them. But using that to take away the credit from Harmison seems ridiculous. It is not like he just ran up and put the ball into the pitch and picked up the wickets. The guy did the hard work and reaped his rewards.




And I definitely believe that he will go on to be a great bowler. Jones, Hoggard and Anderson? I don't think they are anything special, but Flintoff and Harmison are definitely two for the top draw. Harmison has got pace and bounce and pretty reasonable control that would make him dangerous on any surface, point that was proved when he seemed to be the only one giving Lara even the mildest of problems in Antigua, on that featherbed. It was Lara's amazing concentration and quality that denied Harmison there. Just because he has had a poor start to his career does not mean that he will have a poor run throughout. As badgerhair has pointed out, bowlers have had worser starts and yet gone on to greater things.....



And to reply to the topic, I think any really good spinner at the subcontinental conditions would have tested Bradman.....Also the fearsome foursome of the Windies..
 
Last edited:

Top