Yeah, 'cause it was an absolute crime for me to notice a post and comment on it, in a positive light.BTW - knew I should've thought twice before linking to a thread in which I'd posted with Perm around.![]()
I thought you were being sarcastic as the said bowler hasn't achieved anything of note yet and others might have read it that way too.Yeah, 'cause it was an absolute crime for me to notice a post and comment on it, in a positive light.
Nah, meant it honestly.I thought you were being sarcastic as the said bowler hasn't achieved anything of note yet and others might have read it that way too.
If you're a batsman and you don't experience any inkling of fear when facing guys like Shoaib and Lee then I'd have to suggest that there's probably something wrong with you.Any three or four man attack chosen from that lot would strike the same fear into quality batsman as Herman Munster at best and Mary Poppins at worst.
I voted !Shoaib Akhtar !!!
If you're a batsman and you don't experience any inkling of fear when facing guys like Shoaib and Lee then I'd have to suggest that there's probably something wrong with you.
Shoaib, when hes actually fit is very consistently quick and maintains a good line throughout his spells, so I'm not sure what you're talking about there. Lee also has improved a lot, and while he may not have the same raw pace that he used to have, he's definitely improved his consistency. Both are capable of considerable damage, both bodily and otherwise, and I wouldn't want to face either if given the choice.I don't think any "quality" batsman would be in fear of either. Shoaib is quick but very inconsistant and not especially accurate, Lee's is also inconsistant, and not fearsome.
Maybe in 1997. However, the above comment seems to indicate you are talking out of your ass on this one.Shoaib is quick but very inconsistant and not especially accurate
Neither would I, but then neither of us are quality batsman.Shoaib, when hes actually fit is very consistently quick and maintains a good line throughout his spells, so I'm not sure what you're talking about there. Lee also has improved a lot, and while he may not have the same raw pace that he used to have, he's definitely improved his consistency. Both are capable of considerable damage, both bodily and otherwise, and I wouldn't want to face either if given the choice.
It shouldn't take long for longtime posters here to judge why this was not a public poll.No more than anything else.
There's no reasonable doubt that that's what it was.
Incidentally - wah seems to be gone at present. Wonder where he is, and how long before he starts bothering us again?
Craig Cumming would beg to disagree as well.As a batsmen there are bowlers you are scared that will get you out - lots of these around including the spinners - but a scary bowler is one you are scared will hurt you. Not much of that in international cricket these days - although tail enders would disagree.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59aLAnZ_uJ0Craig Cumming would beg to disagree as well.