dont u ever forget that trescothick cant bat???good god!their last good partnership came what 2 yrs ago against a horrible SL bowling attack.marc71178 said:How on Earth are the Indian pair only one vote behind the South Africans, and yet Vaughan and Trescothick have none?
gayle=horrible while hinds=even worse,perhaps the luckiest player in the side and if you're the luckiest player in the WI side you know how bad you really are. and dont even try to back him up when he has averages of 26,16,19,13 against aus,eng,nz,sa respectively and when his overall average is 31. id pick papps and richardson over gayle and hinds even if theyve only played 3 tests together.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Rather, how on earth did Papps and Richardson make this poll and Hinds and Gayle were left out. If memory serves correct they average around 44 with 3 hundred stands.
With 1.1-1.2 BILLION people in India and considering how fanatical they are about their own cricket team/players, I'm absolutely flabbergasted that they're not AHEAD in the poll.How on Earth are the Indian pair only one vote behind the South Africans, and yet Vaughan and Trescothick have none?
In regards to the best of the rest, on current form, Sehwag & Chopra. Though Sehwag is mainly getting the runs in the partnership as Chopra mainly is just playing a very defensive game.shankar said:An interesting question would be, if you take out the S.African and Australian pairs who's the best of the rest?
Many CricketWeb Indians are a discerning bunch, as are many CW Pakistanis, many CW English, many CW Austrians (heh) etc.hellnback said:With 1.1-1.2 BILLION people in India and considering how fanatical they are about their own cricket team/players, I'm absolutely flabbergasted that they're not AHEAD in the poll.
The rest of the countries TOGETHER wouldn't get as many votes, and it's not like the average Indian cricket fan isn't blind to facts and reasonable logic.
They can be abit like the English who continued to celebrate 1966 for 37 years for some reason... apparently they have something else to celebrate now??? (j/k'ing)
Actually the thread is about the best opners in the game and not the worst!Bouncer said:Where are Taufiq Umar and Imran Farhat in that list?:rolleyes:
wahindiawah said:Actually the thread is about the best opners in the game and not the worst!
No, I'm strictly 'terrace' at Derbyshire. Besides, cucumber sandwiches have a high water content, therefore there is real danger of them freezing to your hands at Derbyshire's ground in April.Craig said:Is that a day at one of Derbyshire CCC's matches or sitting with the rich members?
Maybe its because more people think that Sehwag and Chopra are a better pairing than Trescothick and Vaughan ?marc71178 said:How on Earth are the Indian pair only one vote behind the South Africans, and yet Vaughan and Trescothick have none?
Could be, could be....jamesryfler said:Maybe its because more people think that Sehwag and Chopra are a better pairing than Trescothick and Vaughan ?
i dont think marc rates trescothick either and its not like vaughan has been scoring bucket full of runs over the last yr.luckyeddie said:Could be, could be....
Interesting to note that, if Trescothick and Vaughan have bagged no votes at all, that means that (shock horror) Marc didn't vote for them either.
What does your take on Gayle's and Hinds' technique have to do with their record as openers?tooextracool said:gayle=horrible while hinds=even worse,perhaps the luckiest player in the side and if you're the luckiest player in the WI side you know how bad you really are. and dont even try to back him up when he has averages of 26,16,19,13 against aus,eng,nz,sa respectively and when his overall average is 31. id pick papps and richardson over gayle and hinds even if theyve only played 3 tests together.
It's quite possible that Marc doesn't rate them as the best opening pair, but rates them better than the Indian pair.tooextracool said:i dont think marc rates trescothick either and its not like vaughan has been scoring bucket full of runs over the last yr.
I don't consider India to have had much better success in openers than Pakistan.ajaagarkarajaaja said:Pakistan has a history of cartoon version of openers.
Indeed that is so - these 2 Indians are good so far, but not done it for that long yet.Mr Mxyzptlk said:It's quite possible that Marc doesn't rate them as the best opening pair, but rates them better than the Indian pair.
Mr Mxyzptlk said:I don't consider India to have had much better success in openers than Pakistan.
this doesnt make any sense.Indeed that is so - these 2 Indians are good so far, but not done it for that long yet.
I actually would put them around a par with Trescothick and Vaughan in 3rd behind the other 2 I mentioned.