And Mitchell?Barry is rated along with the likes of Richards, Sobers, Lara and Tendulkar.
Graeme is comparable to Hayden and probably above Sehwag.
This isn't remotely close.
And Mitchell?
Was Barry unanimously rated ahead of Gavaskar?I'm sure many see it as a meme or joke, but Barry was an upper top tier level batsman. He was simply brilliant.
If the aliens are landing tomorrow and we are in the time machine collecting players to play for earth, he's one of the first and easiest picks.
He also is part of the link of best batsmen in the world from Hobbs to Smith.
In the 70's?Was Barry unanimously rated ahead of Gavaskar?
Don't think this thread is asking for the better "test" opener.Barry played 4 Tests as an opener.
Mitchell played 27 Tests as an opener.
Smith played 113 Tests as an opener.
Nothing to do with who was the better batsman.Barry played 4 Tests as an opener.
Mitchell played 27 Tests as an opener.
Smith played 113 Tests as an opener.
Doesn't matter how it's phrased.Don't think this thread is asking for the better "test" opener.
And did you expect Mitchell to play 100 tests in the 30's?
Why do you get angry when I posted a simple factDon't think this thread is asking for the better "test" opener.
I didn't get angry. I just said that the thread might not be asking this purely based on tests.Why do you get angry when I posted a simple fact
Just joking man.I didn't get angry. I just said that the thread might not be asking this purely based on tests.
I apologize if I've caused any trouble.