this should be the other way round. Ganguly shouldn't even be mentioned here! and Lara is ordinary........tooextracool said:
lara shouldnt even be mentioned here
ganguly is ordinary in my opinion because he has a very talented side perhaps just as talented as the aussies, yet they doesnt seem to be able to beat them.
i am in total agreement. how on Earth can anyone classify Ponting as one of the best captains. He's probably one of the newest captains around!BlackCap_Fan said:Anyone who thinks Ponting is the best captain is either a Biased Aussie,or an Aussie.
Fleming is the best captain in the world,end of story.
Been in the job quite a while actually.Cactus said:i am in total agreement. how on Earth can anyone classify Ponting as one of the best captains. He's probably one of the newest captains around!
are you talking about ponting or waugh?marc71178 said:Been in the job quite a while actually.
And in that time he did lead Aus to something like 20 wins in a row.
are you talking about ponting or waugh?marc71178 said:Been in the job quite a while actually.
And in that time he did lead Aus to something like 20 wins in a row.
I dont think he could make too many wrong decisions....... I dont think it was possible...Mr. Ponting said::rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Richard man, if you had ANY idea you wouldn't be saying that.
I am not saying Ponting is the best of the listed captains, I put Fleming as my best, but really. Did you watch any of the recent VB series? His captaincy was superb, all the right decisions at the right times. I'm sure many people could back this up.
My list of those captains:
1. Fleming (Magnificent, one of the best I have seen)
2. Ponting
3. Ganguly (He's good, but IMO he doesn't use his bowlers very well)
4. Lara (Just not as good as the forementioned.)
oh no,is Harmison going to bowl on the pitch in that series?Neil Pickup said:Ponting in ODIs.
I'd take Fleming over anyone by a margin.
Still, won't save you over here in May/June..![]()
if harmison dont get u jones must!!BlackCap_Fan said:oh no,is Harmison going to bowl on the pitch in that series?
im quite sure vaughan's strike rate will be higher than all of ur nz players bar cairnsBlackCap_Fan said:is vaughns strike rate going to be above 19.00?
[/B]
hehe good joke....if ur team has any chance of winning the series it will rely heavily on shane bond and daniel vettori(crucial to last times victory)BlackCap_Fan said:well,looks like a couple thousand more runs to fleming,and a hundred more wickets to tuffey and oram....
pass the popcorn. [/B]
im not a big fan of ganguly but to be honest with you he is the best choice for captain out of the current bunch of players in the indian team. he may not be very smart or innovative but he leads from the front and his team respects him. but as i said earlier...his captaincy is nothing but ordinary and should never have been considered as the best around.Arjun said:Ganguly is definitely the worst captain around. Look at the number of bowling failures he has had, that can cost a match, and have. Three times, his team has been guilty of conceding 340+ totals and not once do we see steps of improvement- in fact, they go backwards. The worst part is that when the fielding is a bit weak, the captain of the team is the worst fielder, so he can't do anything about it! Why he still persists with that match-losing move of Dravid keeping is a mystery.
That cannot mask the fact that he is a bad captain. Besides,. Laxman, Dravid and Kumble are better captains. At least Dravid tries different things to get results, rather than persist with something that just does not work and has no hope.to be honest with you he is the best choice for captain out of the current bunch of players in the indian team.
A sound thrashing of his bowlers from West Indian or Australian batsmen puts him on the back foot. Besides, even though there are the likes of Yuvraj and Kaif on the field, the captain himself can't field and that too rubs off on the rest of the team.he may not be very smart or innovative but he leads from the front and his team respects him.
At least Kirmani was doing the right thing in gettign Parthiv to keep in ODI's. Parthiv may not be the greatest WK around, but he's FAR better than Dravid, who is unfortunately considered again for a job where he cannot be of any use.i dont think its his decision abt whether dravid should keep, its upto the coach and the selectors to decide who plays and who doesnt although he does have a miniscule role in deciding the final 11