Didn't MCullum broke this record? Or was it the fastest century?Nathan Astle at Christchurch on our 2002 tour.
Never seen a batsman more in "the zone". England had set NZ well over 500 to win and his 222 got them to within double digits of it.
Still the fastest double hundred ever.
McCullum has the fastest century. In another test he (Mccullum) was set for the fastest 200 but was dismissed for 195.Didn't MCullum broke this record? Or was it the fastest century?
That's the innings where I realised Warne was the GOATPaul Collingwood in Adelaide. 206 in the first dig then not out 22 off 119 as his team fell about him in the second dig to somehow lose that test.
Other batsmen with 10 or more:After seeing Lara many times in the above link, I checked how many times did Lara score 200 and above in a test match ( both innings combined)
So here is the list
Sangakkara 17( 5 against BAN + ZIM)
Lara (15)
Kohli 13 (1 against BAN )
Smith (8)
Kind of hard to blame Mongia despite his daft shot to get out. His partnership with Sachin was the only reason we were still in the game.It was always another inferior batsman who screwed up the winning chance in all those 3 losses. Jadeja during 175, Laxman during 143 and Mongia and co. during 136.
Possible to do it over the career including average? Just interested to see who was more unlucky between Sachin and Lara?
lara's teammates were far worse so I dont think itd be closePossible to do it over the career including average? Just interested to see who was more unlucky between Sachin and Lara?
Kind of hard to blame Mongia despite his daft shot to get out. His partnership with Sachin was the only reason we were still in the game.
Not close, has to be Lara without even looking. Yes I know up until the early 00s lara had Ambrose and Walsh but thereafter he had zero decent bowlers and only Shiv as a world class batsman.Possible to do it over the career including average? Just interested to see who was more unlucky between Sachin and Lara?