My mates knew this long ago. India behind the times again.this Indian fan anti-Kohli sentiment growing on CW will not be forgotten by me. A plague on all your penises.
.
Please, Pujara is basically Ranveer Singh which..... kinda reiterates your point tbfthis Indian fan anti-Kohli sentiment growing on CW will not be forgotten by me. A plague on all your penises.
Also Pujara is fair ugly. If he's coming in the team we need to bring back Jadeja to counter his ugliness with some delicious moustacheness.
If you ignore the over 30's. its Sarfraz and Shafiq a good bit clear of the rest against spin. Azhar isn't as bad as some say, but he can get bogged down against spinners and will give a chance or two. Can't think of many under Pakistani players apart from Shafiq and Sarfraz that inspire me to much against spinners these days.isn't azhar ali also pretty good against spin?
There's something about Sri Lankan lefthanders. They play leg spin unbelievably well, unless named Sangakkara. Gurusinha, Ranathunga, Tillekaratne, Arnold and Jayasuriya all played great legspinners of their time pretty well (Qadir, Kumble and Warne, and possibly Hirwani few times). But they tend to suck against off break bowlers, some times pretty mediocre ones. Ranatunga and Tillekaratne were pretty good against any type of spin though.Thought Karunartne played Yasir Shah excellently in that 3rd test against Pakistan,but haven't really seen much else from his apart from that.Latham was awesome against the spin in UAE last year.
don't forget the sri lankanat least against just swing it's the pom or the kiwi, which is more normal.
He's not poor by any means but he has had issues with Herath and as Niall mentioned can get bogged down but that can happen to him against any type of bowling. Asad and Sarfraz are much more assured and have more shots vs spin. Infact Asad is our most complete batsman in a long long time if he can stop being casual and lazy early in his innings he is very capable of averaging close to 50 in test cricket.isn't azhar ali also pretty good against spin?
Yeah, Smith's generally in a good position when he makes contact with the ball in spite of how awful his stance/set-up looks. That said, I just can't get over the stance in terms of finding him pleasing to the eye.Smith is technically very good and actually pleasing to watch against Spin. I won't carry on about his technique against pace because you have that already in your signature but I would be tempted to say that Smith is better than Williamson against spin. Primarily because he is more aggressive and prepared to use his feet more.
Smith played very well in UAE and India. Harsh to say he needs to ton up when he's got two 90s. The 90-odd he got at Mohali was the first time I really thought he could turn out to be very good.Yeah, Smith's generally in a good position when he makes contact with the ball in spite of how awful his stance/set-up looks. That said, I just can't get over the stance in terms of finding him pleasing to the eye.
In terms of him possibly being a better player of spin than KW, he needs to ton-up in the SC a few times before I'm close to being convinced of that.
Exactly what Howsie just said. KW's played 12 tests in Asia, averages 48 and has 4 hundreds & 4 fifties. So yeah, compared to KW, it's actually not harsh at all.Smith played very well in UAE and India. Harsh to say he needs to ton up when he's got two 90s. The 90-odd he got at Mohali was the first time I really thought he could turn out to be very good.