agreed & I'd probably have Walsh 3rd.........JBH001 said:Early part of the 90's I'd say Waqar Younis.
Late 90's Glen McGrath.
But for consistency of the course of the decade I'd opt for Wasim Akram with Curtly Ambrose as a close second.
Btw, Hello all. Nice to be here and all that.
Yeah....so Bradman shouldnt be considered the best since he hasnt played for like 50 years?McGrath great? Yes. Best in the world even though he hasnt played in something like 7-9 months? IMO no. Best ever? Definatly not. Definatly biases.
Where did South Africas Donald duck stand on the list?Originally posted by DJ Bumstuff......McGrath the best ever? That's a little over the top, don't you think? For what it's worth, Wisden did a statistical analysis of the best bowlers in the history of the game and Chuck came first, followed by Hadlee, Barnes, Warne and Grimmett. I don't know where McGrath came, but I'd be surprised if it was in the top 10
I've seen enough to say you can hold your own.DJ Bumfluff said:I am obviously a midget amongst comic giants here.
Well, I thought Donald Duck was damn funnier than the" Chuck " you mentioned, dont you think ?P.S. Did I nark you off in some way? If so, would you care to explain how?
Awww, come on now, you embarrass me.All hail orangepitch, the King of Cricket Comedy!!!
Naaah, schoolboy stuff there. In a jiffy.Ha ha ha, you changed my name in your post..........hilarious!!! How did you come up with that? That must've taken you ages to develop, but it was well worth it!
You're not wrong there.orangepitch said:Naaah, schoolboy stuff there
Why am I getting all huffy?'Chuck' wasn't supposed to be funny. Believe me, I find nothing funny about someone who is about to be the world record Test wicket taker getting there on the back of an action that wouldn't be out of place at a darts tournament. Although I don't see why you're getting all huffy with me because I think Murali chucks.
I disagree. In my opinion, Murali chucks everything that leaves his hand.orangepitch said:Why am I getting all huffy?
Maybe bcoz Murali doesnt 'chuck ' all his deliveries.
The ICC has ruled only his doosra illegal, and thats a delivery he's developed only recently. So you cant say that he's taken all his wickets throwing his deliveries.
Hee hee hee... Well, I laughed. But then again, I'm seven.orangepitch said:Originally posted by DJ Bumstuff......
If it's current best player (as the McGrath thing) then no.orangepitch said:Yeah....so Bradman shouldnt be considered the best since he hasnt played for like 50 years?
DJ Bumfluff said:I disagree. In my opinion, Murali chucks everything that leaves his hand.
No they said he hyper-extends - thy concluded that there was nothing wrong with his action that should prevent him bowling, hence he doesn't chuck.DJ Bumfluff said:Those same scientists 'cleared' Akhtar despite including in their reports that he chucks.
Again, no they didn't, they recommended changing a ruling on tolerance (which seems strange to have different levels to me) and then when that never happened said he shouldn't bowl it.DJ Bumfluff said:They also said that despite chucking his doosra, Murali should be allowed to continue bowling it.