Prince EWS
Global Moderator
And Hilfenhaus.Haha, if ever fanboyism influences my views, it's probably in case of Martyn.
And Hilfenhaus.Haha, if ever fanboyism influences my views, it's probably in case of Martyn.
No, I'm beginning to see the merit in what you were saying regarding him.And Hilfenhaus.
No, the point is that when chasing, the SR is somewhat irrelevant if you are consistently getting to the score in enough time - which is exactly what Bevan did. He was famous for batting a long time with the tail, rotating the strike and picking off runs. Generally, the slower you score runs the safer you are - and Bevan was as safe as houses when chasing.That's a ;ame excuse because it is the trend in every #6/7 batsman. For example Dhoni's 1 st innings SR is 92, 2nd innings SR is 84. According to your assumption Dhoni's SR should be regarded as 92. And for A Ranatunga (a renowned game finisher), 1st innings 81 second innings 76.
Even if you take the global trend for No 6/7 batsmen, (post 1992), 78.64 & 71.9
So Bevan is not special at all in this regard. Most #6/7 batsmen knew that, and most of them have higher 1st innings SRs. Still a SR of 80 from Bevan in 1st innings is nothing extra ordinary.
Did he? WAG.Martyn had a broken thumb in that innings didn't he?
youtrollin?.jpg1. Viv Richards
2. Sachin Tendulkar
3. Zaheer Abbas
4. Day Light
5. The Rest...
Well for a long time (till about 2003), Zaheer Abbas was one of only 3 (along with Viv and Tendulkar) who averaged 40+ and had an SR of 80+. So even if you disagree with that, it isn't exactly so outrageous to react like that!youtrollin?.jpg
The daylight at 4 says you are trolling because you clearly haven't seen Haynes, Javed,Ponting, Lara, Deano, Inzamam and Saeed Anwar
Upright Zed was a good ODI batsman averaging 47 after 60 odd matches...but 3rd best.
With all due respect GTF0.
Might as well put Hashim Amla in the top 10.
Abbas FTW.Well for a long time (till about 2003), Zaheer Abbas was one of only 3 (along with Viv and Tendulkar) who averaged 40+ and had an SR of 80+. So even if you disagree with that, it isn't exactly so outrageous to react like that!
EDIT: Correction. There were 4 including Klusener.
For The Win. But since coming out of gaming slang it's essentially meant "**** yeah".What is FTW?
Agreed. I am actually beginning to rethink my vote. Tendulkar's record as an opener is quite extra-ordinary!Stats for openers in ODIs, 20 innings minimum
Didn't realise Dilshan had done so well as an opener tbh.
Changing it to 50 innings minimum highlights my point better though - Tendulkar dominates all other openers in ODIs by a ridiculous margain.
I would change my vote to Tendulkar in a heartbeat in polls like this were he to score a defining knock, preferably a match-winning century, in the knockout stage of the upcoming World Cup (preferably the final ).
That is a bit harsh. I reckon you could make a fair case for Zaheer Abbas being the best ODI batsman of his era - after Sir Viv Richards, of course. A number of the older Pakistani fans rate him higher than Saeed Anwar and Inzamam-ul-Haq. There is not much doubt that he is one of the best ODI batsmen of all-time.youtrollin?.jpg
The daylight at 4 says you are trolling because you clearly haven't seen Haynes, Javed,Ponting, Lara, Deano, Inzamam and Saeed Anwar
Upright Zed was a good ODI batsman averaging 47 after 60 odd matches...but 3rd best.
With all due respect GTF0.
Might as well put Hashim Amla in the top 10.