I think it's just one of those things we're you have to realise that cricket and Battrick are two different things. Instead of looking at it from a cricketing point of view (that you should be looking at 350+ with heaps of wickets left), look at it from a Battrick point of view (that Mutasa is a good bowler and he cleaned up in the last 10).Scaly piscine said:
third 6andyc said:Third century for the match
Yea, cricket is fun and Battrick is a joke. 300 all out. You can be damn sure I'm gonna keep complaining about this sloblock on Battrick's sledging boards til I get a response from Allan.andyc said:
I get the impression worthless bats do better than similarly crap but bit better bats a lot of the time, certainly the guy I bought averages much more than my woeful-woeful (5.75 at 74 SR compared to 1.50 at 20 SR) averages slightly more than my feeble-woeful too.Bobisback said:
Don't know how much response you'll get - the last he said about it in the last Q&AScaly piscine said:
Q&A said:
Mcmillan is gone, but Gray and Jones doing well.. should be interesting now..Robertinho said:
Well if that's his attitude then he's getting no more money from me because he's clearly wrong - collapses as bad as that hardly ever happen in real life, general collapses are also way more frequent on Battrick than in real life. In real life losing your last 5 wickets for 30 is a collapse - in Battrick that would be the tail wagging.superkingdave said:
Thats his 3rd for the match. Good innings, too bad i dont have bowlers to back it up.
