FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Barbados. This is not a vote, I'm just naming a place.
So we can mark the Kolkata Test down for dodgy decisions in India's favour, but write off decisions in Australia's favour in Hobart with a "but that's cricket"? Double standards there.VVs's was fine inning but one can not ignore the silk touvh anwar was in at hobart, alot of people do not remember that inning when Pak were close to 200(190+) in deficit and Anwar and Youssaf played amazing inning in last session and took Pak from 190.....oh wair that was Brisbane...my bad.
But still in Hobart Pak seemed doomed when Aussies were 1/190 following Pak's 220+ and then collapsed to Saqlain and waqar's brilliance...who unlike Harbhajan didnt even have any Umpire's assistance....this is one of the biggest factor i'd rate Hobart as better of two games as the teams competing is more fair (except 4th inning where couple of decisions went into Aussie favor, but thats cricket) and more competitive envirenment and it were the Touring team and not the host who looked to win the game.
so Hobart, it is.
Pick Hobart, if you feel it is the better test match. Just dont post Bull****.VVs's was fine inning but one can not ignore the silk touvh anwar was in at hobart, alot of people do not remember that inning when Pak were close to 200(190+) in deficit and Anwar and Youssaf played amazing inning in last session and took Pak from 190.....oh wair that was Brisbane...my bad.
But still in Hobart Pak seemed doomed when Aussies were 1/190 following Pak's 220+ and then collapsed to Saqlain and waqar's brilliance...who unlike Harbhajan didnt even have any Umpire's assistance....this is one of the biggest factor i'd rate Hobart as better of two games as the teams competing is more fair (except 4th inning where couple of decisions went into Aussie favor, but thats cricket) and more competitive envirenment and it were the Touring team and not the host who looked to win the game.
so Hobart, it is.