• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Cricketers

BoyBrumby

Englishman
I've just been watching the highlights of the 4th day of the Super Test &, although Lara played little more than a cameo, he was still a joy to watch. His timing & his vision are just so magical he always makes me think "how did he do that?".

Imran was probably the best of the big 4 of the 80s and was a genuine all-rounder. Certainly a great leader of men too, which is something great players can sometimes struggle to be too. Heart says one thing, head says another....

Ah, hell,

Lara

No-one I would rather pay money to watch. :)
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Very, very hard. Lara is the best batsman I have ever seen, all things considered. Imran is in the top 5 and probably the top 3 best all-rounders of all time, and was devastating with the ball at his peak.

I'll vote for Imran, very marginally, mostly because he's losing.
 

Robertinho

Cricketer Of The Year
Brian Lara for me.. he's a star

Jamee999 said:
The 3rd Place Match.

Gives us the winnner out of the top 2, and then the Best of the Rest.
No, it's spoiling the whole competition because certain players (such Hobbs) have no chance against Bradman/Sobers and get knocked out prematurely without having a chance. It's stupid having Bradman and Sobers... completely ruins the whole competiton
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Robertinho said:
Brian Lara for me.. he's a star


No, it's spoiling the whole competition because certain players (such Hobbs) have no chance against Bradman/Sobers and get knocked out prematurely without having a chance. It's stupid having Bradman and Sobers... completely ruins the whole competiton
So a battle to find the BEST cricketer it's stupid to have the 2 BEST cricketers ever?

Spot the logic...
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Jamee999 said:
So a battle to find the BEST cricketer it's stupid to have the 2 BEST cricketers ever?

Spot the logic...
U should call it the battle for the 3rd best cricketer ever, Jamee, since we already know who the top 2 are gonna be.
 

Top