Goughy said:
Would Hayden make an All-time Aus XI? Probably
Would Grimmett make an All-time Aus XI? No
Hayden
Hayden may possibly have been the best Aussie batsman over the Australian long term domination of World cricket. Thats nothing to be sneezed at.
Thats a strange argument.
Firstly Grimmett did make many people's all time World XI (not just Australian XI) till Warne happened. Even today there are those who rate him a better leg spinner but thats not all.
Secondly In a country which has produced in Warne, Grimmett and Orielly three of the greatest bowlers (any type) of all time in the world (not just Australia) AND when all three happen to be basically leg spinners, is it a surprise that one or two of them will be left out from an XI. If Australia had the world's ten greatest wicket keppers (and they have a pretty impressive list) nine would be out though they would be legends in their own right.
Ponting, for example, would never make anyone's all time Australian XI's one-drop batsman with the Don firmly esconsed there. Is that an argument against Ponting or even when comparing Ponting to lets say, another bowler ?
Hunte (or Haynes) might make most people's all time West Indies XI but when selecting the fats bowlers you will have to leave our from this list (Ambrose, Walsh, Holding, Marshall, Roberts, Croft, Hall, Garner) Is this an argument in favour of Hunte or against Roberts whom some may leave out. Or the West Indies middle order with Weekes, Worrell, Walcott, Kanhai, Headley, Lara, Richard etc.
One can say one feels that Hayden is a better player than Grimmett and its fine since its an opinion but to say he is a better player BECAUSE he may find a place in a side in which Grimmett wont is strange for they are required for different role.
Grimmett would find himself in EVERY England side (not probably) while Hayden wont with Hobbs, Hutton and Sutcliffe to contend with.