Yeah that's right too. Just don't think it was done then mate. Different era. If someone turned on a stink against a player back then, more likely to be set upon by other fans I think.I'd actually say Snowy's probably as well regarded down under amongst cricket fans of a certain age as he is up here too; in Sky's (rather excellent) documentary on the 70/71 tour Chappelli was very fulsome in his praise for Snow.
What I meant more was that passions were (by pretty much every account) running high on the Bodyline tour, but even at Adelaide Harold or Bill (nor the Great Satan DRJ either come to that) weren't manhandled as Snow was on the boundary on the SCG.
& obviously Lol famously wouldn't apologise for his part either; the fact his old mucker did set them at loggerheads for a time too.
Holy crap. Knew there was a big ex player turn out, but that's nuts. Cheers for the link.I'm trying to find that clip from the 77 Test on YouTube. Just saw part one of the highlights, and it's all the old blokes getting off the planes. Some amazing names. Remember Lillee saying that when they were at the function there were so many greats there he half expected God to wander past with a beer.
Part one is here, in case anyone's interested, seeing as this is a bit of a nostalgia thread:
YouTube - 1977 Centenary Test Highlights Part 1: Australia Versus England
I've always found it interesting that Australians can worship Lillee and Thompson on the one hand, and cry about Bodyline on the other.So I'd say those two were pretty well respected here tbh, and not unloved. What the ACB did for them would be the equivalent of England having its 150th Test year celebrations and inviting Lillee and Thommo out onto the ground to be feted before play starts. And we all know there's no way England are magnanimous enough to do such a gentlemanly thing.
Well if you thought Lillee and Thommo were bad, put 8 blokes in a ring around the batsman on the leg side and see how bad it would have been.I've always found it interesting that Australians can worship Lillee and Thompson on the one hand, and cry about Bodyline on the other.
I don't agree with your point that the leg-side fielders turned it into a blood sport. They just turned intimidatory bowling (and no more intimidatory than Lillee and Thomson's) into negative intimidatory bowling, because the field set that way made it so difficult to score. The blood-sport element is the same either way. In fact the guy who really did regard bowling as a blood sport, literally, was Jeff "I enjoy hitting a batsman more than getting him out. I like to see blood on the pitch" Thomson.Well if you thought Lillee and Thommo were bad, put 8 blokes in a ring around the batsman on the leg side and see how bad it would have been.
I think it was just regarded as a gentler time mate. It offended the sensibilities somewhat. Not so much the short stuff (if you've seen any footage of 1930 you'll see how Bradman treated Larwood) but the field placements gave it the feel of turning what was regarded (pretty much anyway) as a genteel sport into a blood sport.
Haha yeah AWTA.I don't agree with your point that the leg-side fielders turned it into a blood sport. They just turned intimidatory bowling (and no more intimidatory than Lillee and Thomson's) into negative intimidatory bowling, because the field set that way made it so difficult to score. The blood-sport element is the same either way. In fact the guy who really did regard bowling as a blood sport, literally, was Jeff "I enjoy hitting a batsman more than getting him out. I like to see blood on the pitch" Thomson.
So true about the Thommo part. Though I believe you have to have lived through the Bodyline era to properly understand the dynamics and perceptions about it back then.I don't agree with your point that the leg-side fielders turned it into a blood sport. They just turned intimidatory bowling (and no more intimidatory than Lillee and Thomson's) into negative intimidatory bowling, because the field set that way made it so difficult to score. The blood-sport element is the same either way. In fact the guy who really did regard bowling as a blood sport, literally, was Jeff "I enjoy hitting a batsman more than getting him out. I like to see blood on the pitch" Thomson.
Completely missing the context surrounding the bodyline series.I don't agree with your point that the leg-side fielders turned it into a blood sport. They just turned intimidatory bowling (and no more intimidatory than Lillee and Thomson's) into negative intimidatory bowling, because the field set that way made it so difficult to score. The blood-sport element is the same either way. In fact the guy who really did regard bowling as a blood sport, literally, was Jeff "I enjoy hitting a batsman more than getting him out. I like to see blood on the pitch" Thomson.
Yeah, Australia lost that series.Completely missing the context surrounding the bodyline series.
ClearlyYeah, Australia lost that series.
Intimidatory bowling is only ok if Australia are winning.
Clearly
So sick of you English posters. I'll truly neck myself if we lose at home
Oh wait. I forgot the smiley. I can say whatever I want now!
Wait a second. Think I've made a boo boo. I'm sick of all UK posters!