dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Yeah it's unbelievable that people could vote for Wiki ahead of Stuart.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Battle of the ARL/NRL Stars**
- Thread starter Blewy
- Start date
alternative
Cricket Web Content Updater
Ricky Stuart.
Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Don't care how good Stuart was, it's bloody Ruben Wiki. For a Kiwi fan, he's just the best.
Last edited:
chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
TBH if you take out the hype of the play maker and the fact that Wiki palyed in some crap sides, Wiki is better overall.
Simon
Request Your Custom Title Now!
maybe its the fact i watched the 1990 grand final a few weeks ago and Stuart was just incredible in that game, he always had so many close battles with Langer too, I never really used to like the Raiders when he played for them but I couldnt deny how good he was...
age_master
Hall of Fame Member
Stuart
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Stuart.
Perm
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He's a Kiwi, making him infinitely superior to Ricky Stuart
vic_orthdox
Global Moderator
Stuart.
steds
Hall of Fame Member
For a start, no. I don't itbt. Secondly, I went off this:
I assumed Stuart's best would have been before 95, but Wiki's been bloody good for the whole of said period.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
There's also the fact that the NRL started in 1998, meaning the greatest NRL team since 1995, 1998 - or 26BC for that matter - would be exactly the same....
