• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of Britain

Who is the best team in Britain????

  • !!!WARWICKSHIRE!!!

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Glamorgan

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Kent

    Votes: 9 42.9%
  • Worcestershire

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lancashire

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Somerset

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Hampshire

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Leicester

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Yorkshire

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Surrey

    Votes: 2 9.5%

  • Total voters
    21

nibbs

International Captain
IMO Kent are the best team in Britain, just edging out Warwickshire. One thing is fo sho, its not Surrey.
 

Rich2001

International Captain
Should be intresting, a few weeks ago Blewy (or someone else ;) ) started this excat same thread and would be intresting to see if the results have changed in the few weeks.
 

Simon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
to me 4day is mosre important and on paper i think yorkshire have the best side, so i voted them.
 

nibbs

International Captain
Rich2001 said:
Should be intresting, a few weeks ago Blewy (or someone else ;) ) started this excat same thread and would be intresting to see if the results have changed in the few weeks.
Yes, But IMO that thread lacked an exciting, dramatic poll like this one!
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
nibblet said:
IMO Kent are the best team in Britain, just edging out Warwickshire. One thing is fo sho, its not Surrey.
It appears the people agree with you on the best, but the 2nd best is an interesting vote.
 

lord_of_darkness

Cricket Web XI Moderator
kent 7 votes... hmm so far in the kent vs hampshire rivalry we are on a winning streak of 3 ....

Considering what hampshire was at the start of Wcc, i think a major change has been seen :)
 

Graham

3rd Umpire
My Lancashire side don't seem to rate a mention, but I note that we're level with Kent in the OD competition and comfortably ahead of them in the FC competition! Also we're through to the VB Cup semis along with Kent.
 

Rich2001

International Captain
lord_of_darkness said:
Seriously it would be somewhere along

Lancashire
Kent
Yorkshire
Hampshire
Surrey
For a serious answer I agree to an extent with Lord, Surrey have gone off the boil a bit after last season, but on paper still have a very good side.

Yorkshire are the other way around IMO, last season was a big let down.. but some good trading has seen them suddenly turn good and even if the team on paper doesn't quite look as strong the whole team chips in a does well overall.

Lancashire, I've always rated Lancashire highly they have some fine indivual players and I would say they are nearly identical to Kent, you never quite know who will win the match.. very lucky to escape demotion last season on NRR (Was all planned wasn't it Graham ;) ) However a very fine outfit in both forms.

Hampshire, Now where do I start :!( - Must surley be the best side in the world as Kent have a fear of beatting them :!( - But in all seriouness they have some very fine indivual talents, and if they trade well this season they could become a force to be reconked with, just at the present though I think Yorks/Lancs are just ahead, However I think special mention should go to both Hamps and Kent as we had a pile of rubbish when we both started compared to most sides.. so to even be where we are is an achievment!

Kent - Like I said above when we started out we had 2 players over 30 in the OD side (thanks to Lara joining :D ) - we struggled through the season and went from 2nd to relagation candidates in the last week. Over the off season I made a massive gamble to trade Lara to NSW in a deal that saw 3 players arrive and that was the start of things to come as along with the draft players, I suddenly had a few players people wantted and managed to bring the likes of Andy Flower to the side and like the say the rest is history, and hopfully the Kent side will take the next step up in this season's draft/trade. (just got to work out who's leaving first)
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Rich2001 said:
For a serious answer I agree to an extent with Lord, Surrey have gone off the boil a bit after last season, but on paper still have a very good side.
If anyone knows why the team can underperform so often, can they let me know?
 

Rik

Cricketer Of The Year
marc71178 said:
If anyone knows why the team can underperform so often, can they let me know?
Not got anything to do with you managing them then? ;)
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Rik said:
Not got anything to do with you managing them then? ;)
When you get down to it, it is a bunch of numbers, and the numbers asscociated to my team are better than the results I'm getting.

I never had any problems with the team last year, so I don't see how that can be the problem. :P
 

Top