• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Bairstow Dismissal

Was the Bairstow dismissal against the spirit of the game?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 28.6%
  • No

    Votes: 60 71.4%

  • Total voters
    84

Spark

Global Moderator
E: agree with the rest of your post. It's dangerous and I recall Simon Jones smacking Hayden in the chest doing the same.
It became endemic in world cricket - Aus being by far the worst offenders - a couple of years ago, but thankfully that seems to have passed, I can't remember it being much of a thing lately. There's motioning to throw to force the batsman back in his crease, but very little actual throwing.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Haha, yep, 2nd Test. I recall Inzi having a long chat with Afridi before the ball, and the stump mic on the other end picking up Inzi saying "kya yaar" (really mate) when he was bowled.
Inzi really has the most hilarious stories of all cricketers I have read about.

There was this incident that Wasim narrated in an interview about the 1999 WC when it was Pak V Aus in the group/super 6 stages. It was the slog overs and Wasim and Inzy were batting together and apparently Wasim told Inzy to run no matter what. Inzy was on strike and was floored by a yorker but Wasim ran through and apparently Inzy got up and saw Wasim next to him and asked with a confused look "Wasim Bhai, aap yahaan kya kar rahe ho? " (Wasim Bro, what are you doing here?).

:laugh:

Pretty sure the YouTube highlights matches up with that too.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Did anyone really argue that Vettori was wrong to call Collingwood back when the only truly comparable incident occurred? I'm pretty sure it was roundly regarded as good sportsmanship and the proper thing to do.
So I just checked the thread on this and it turns out it was really just me abusing the **** out of McCullum for being a prick and several people coming to his defence

Also featuring Jimmy Neesham telling me second hand that everyone thinks McCullum is a dickhead

 

Flem274*

123/5
So I just checked the thread on this and it turns out it was really just me abusing the **** out of McCullum for being a prick and several people coming to his defence

Also featuring Jimmy Neesham telling me second hand that everyone thinks McCullum is a dickhead

Poor Jimmy, posting on here as a teenager who is talented at cricket is a decision he probably cringes at.

McCullum is 40 odd so he's probably grown up and we're dragging him for ancient history, but he did that punishing youtube gambling ad and should be dragged for it forever lol.

Speaking of, we don't call out Stacey Jones enough for promoting shady loan companies, especially given where the team he played for is based.
 

NotMcKenzie

International Debutant
I think the general reaction was that it was technically, legally out (I think because he was still out of his crease) but it really was a **** thing for Starc to do because hurling the ball straight at the batsman and then appealing when they quite naturally defend themselves from wearing one on the body is **** behaviour even if legal. And I think most people agreed it really shouldn't be legal any longer; you really don't want to incentivise bowlers throwing the ball at batsmen to try and burgle **** wickets.
If it's the incident I'm thinking of, Stokes was out obstructing the field. He sort-of span around and threw his hands up, basically to protect himself from being killed, and one of his hands stopped the ball.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If it's the incident I'm thinking of, Stokes was out obstructing the field. He sort-of span around and threw his hands up, basically to protect himself from being killed, and one of his hands stopped the ball.
That one was definitely out as well. Ball was not going to hit him, and was going close to the stumps and he thrust his hand at full stretch away from his body to block the ball.

Happened so fast you can't really blame him for reacting to it but at the same time he shouldn't be complaining rightfully being dismissed
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Poor Jimmy, posting on here as a teenager who is talented at cricket is a decision he probably cringes at.

McCullum is 40 odd so he's probably grown up and we're dragging him for ancient history, but he did that punishing youtube gambling ad and should be dragged for it forever lol.

Speaking of, we don't call out Stacey Jones enough for promoting shady loan companies, especially given where the team he played for is based.
“Generally speaking but” :laugh:
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Neesh on McCullum:

"This isn't my opinion as I've never met the guy. But the subject has come up a lot while talking to people who have worked with him. He's generally regarded as an arrogant, self-obsessed dickhead. When I say generally, I mean that not one person has had a contrasting opinion."

:laugh:
 

the big bambino

International Captain
Why the **** are people constantly bringing up weird "gotcha" examples that are nothing like this dismissal in an attempt to prove hypocrisy. A stumping when a player's backfoot raises off the ground is standard practice.

The hypocrisy was already proven when everyone realized Bairstow attempted to get Marnus out exactly like Carey a few days ago. We dont need to bring up examples that are completely ill-fitting smh.
When your argument is the spirit of the game then others highlighting any example of your behaviour contradicting your argument is fair.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
That one was definitely out as well. Ball was not going to hit him, and was going close to the stumps and he thrust his hand at full stretch away from his body to block the ball.

Happened so fast you can't really blame him for reacting to it but at the same time he shouldn't be complaining rightfully being dismissed
Oh under the rules it was definitely out; Starc could plausibly claim he was trying to run Stokes out (as he was out of the crease) but Stokes was absolutely just trying to defend himself rather than obstructing the field. The solution there though is to change the laws to put it in the umpires' hands to decide whether he was legitimately protecting himself or obstructing the field, not putting on the fielding captain to withdraw the appeal.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Neesh on McCullum:

"This isn't my opinion as I've never met the guy. But the subject has come up a lot while talking to people who have worked with him. He's generally regarded as an arrogant, self-obsessed dickhead. When I say generally, I mean that not one person has had a contrasting opinion."

:laugh:
Lol the mods should probably hide that, could get awkward if someone found it.
 

RIcho

School Boy/Girl Captain
Pretty much how I feel about it. Aussies didn't cheat, but it felt a little cheap.

Speaking of which, possibly the thing that aggrieves me most is that Green gets credited with a wicket. We've all seen bowlers get spawny wickets with tripe, but this felt as if it was literally eff all to do with him.
I saw a bowler get a wicket on a windy day when the batsman's hat blew off and hit his stumps while he was playing a solid defensive shot.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Lol the mods should probably hide that, could get awkward if someone found it.
Everyone on CW has the highest integrity and has definitely never before dragged forum stuff into real life for the drama.

Also without speculating too much, I'm guessing they probably already know.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Good time for Jimmy to exercise Article 17 of the GDPR tbh.

Take it from me. James really likes it when CW gets reported to national data protection authorities :ph34r:
 

Top