Pratters
Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Linda said:Why bring it up if you are indeed aware of this fact?
Linda said:Why bring it up if you are indeed aware of this fact?
Not really. Unless you call belting around Fidel Edwards as great.Linda said:Why bring it up if you are indeed aware of this fact?
Lets face it, Hussey is some kind of freak.
And neither 3 nor 4 are 5.Linda said:"Tests" is not both forms of the game...
Too true! I only thank the good lord Richard seems to be in one of his extended sulks! I wonder what he'd have made of it?!?FaaipDeOiad said:The reactions to this thread are pretty amusing.
It is indeed a remarkable stat that at any point in their career a player should average over 100 in both forms of the game, and I would be interested in knowing if anyone has ever done it before.
Perhaps send it to Ask Steven at cricinfo?
how do i do this?FaaipDeOiad said:The reactions to this thread are pretty amusing.
It is indeed a remarkable stat that at any point in their career a player should average over 100 in both forms of the game, and I would be interested in knowing if anyone has ever done it before.
Perhaps send it to Ask Steven at cricinfo?
First off, less bypassing the filter. Consider this a warning.Slats4ever said:ffs mate all i'm saying is that it's a stat. I'm not trying to prove anything by it...
If it says one thing but Liam it says the the West Indian attack is s*house.
Hey, I'm as big a fan of Hussey as you'll find outside of Australia.Top_Cat said:I will not hear a bad word against the Ninja! Hang your head in shame! He has God-like batting powers! In fact, he IS God!
Mr Mxyzptlk said:First off, less bypassing the filter. Consider this a warning.
Second, considering that these are some of the Australian averages:
Symonds 5.00
Clarke 12.00
Gilchrist 17.33
...it's not really fair to say that the West Indies bowling has been pathetic. In each Test match Australia's innings has relied on a couple of players to get to winning proportions.
Quite a contradiction wouldn't you say?Mr Mxyzptlk said:played a couple of good innings on flat wickets against the might of the West Indies.
So it's ok for some to say things but not ok for others. Can I get an explanation on why these guys weren't pulled up and I was? I reckon you should check this thread out before you answerMr Mxyzptlk said:First off, less bypassing the filter. Consider this a warning.
you infidel, aa and only aa is god!!!Top_Cat said:I will not hear a bad word against the Ninja! Hang your head in shame! He has God-like batting powers! In fact, he IS God!
Not really. I called the West Indies a weak attack. You called them faecal matter.Slats4ever said:Quite a contradiction wouldn't you say?
Go here: http://aus.cricinfo.com/feedback/Slats4ever said:how do i do this?
I was being facetious... Give me some creditJono said:Not really. Unless you call belting around Fidel Edwards as great.
He played a good knock though.
Brilliant observation, thank you.marc71178 said:And neither 3 nor 4 are 5.
Linda to point out tests is not both forms in 3.. 2..Matteh said:W G Grace after one test averaged over 100....