• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Australian test selection thread 2015/16

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Maxwell at least has the potential to average 50 voges will be lucky to sustain 40 over a few years
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Reasons to keep Voges
- Scored over 1300 domestic runs last year at over 100.
- At the time of this post he is averaging over 48 in Tests.
- Rogers and Clarke retiring means we lose lots of red ball experience (this is the biggest reason by the way)
- We don't have anyone banging on the door of selection
- If we are struggling for a first slip, he is capable
- Haterz think he might be able to sustain an average of 40, which we should probably take

Reasons to get rid of him:
- Old
- untalented
- Performed poorly when in mattered during this current series.

So 66.67% means he should stay. Next question mr.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Yes, I thought you were being generous too. Maxwell isn't going to average 50 with the bat in Test Cricket.
 

howardj

International Coach
Look, on the back of his performance in the previous Test, if Voges makes runs in this current Test (e.g. goes on to get 100 tonight) then fine to keep him

At his age though, he has to keep performing to warrant a place
 

howardj

International Coach
Yeah, the ShaunMarsh inclusion annoyed me too. Also how Khawaja who hasn't made a first class 50, that's right 50 in almost a year is getting ahead of Burns is beyond me.

I've been thinking about the bowling attack more lately and a part of me* thinks that it would be great for TPC (the perfect captain) to get his own side which means that Mitch Johnson would unfortunately be a casualty. I think we can build around:

young core group
Starc 25
Hazlewood 24
Pattinson 25
Cummins 22

a bit older:
Bird 28
Coulter-Nile 28

potential:
Behrendorff 25
Sandhu 22
Plus some random guy who starts the season well and I jump on his bandwagon


My new XI - a team for the present and future.

1 Bancroft 2 Warner 3 Smith 4 Burns 5 Voges 6 MMarsh 7 Nevill 8 Starc 9 Pattinson 10 Lyon 11 Hazlewood

*the other part thinks SIddle should stay in the team. Also, I'm not completely sold on Nev but can't see him not being picked for now.
I really like that post.

It would be great for Smith to be given his own team close to this one; a team which has no shortage of talent

Would love Pattinson to get a decent run with injury
 

adub

International Captain
MJ and Voges are two interesting questions.

Johnson still shows glimpses but Ashes/SA 13/14 is fading from the memory. He certainly hasn't been bad since, but not devastating. We might indeed gain more by having Starc take his spot and focussing of Haze, Cummins, Patto etc to take the other two quicks spots.

Voges being selected for this game could well be a pointer that the selectors would like one old head to go on. If he was going to be dispensed with it would have made more sense playing Smarsh (as with playing Cummins). If he tons up here then he'll surely go to Bangladesh and it could be the plan to try and get a couple of solid years of 40+ average at 4 whilst some more young guys get themselves sorted. I'd reckon it's him or Smarsh. Having both in the side might be a little much.

Also good to see the Tubster not forgetting Moi Moi. Mitch has the opportunity and will continue in Bangladesh most likely, but if he doesn't start contributing more (especially with the bat) Henriques or maybe even Maxwell come into contention for NZ.
 

howardj

International Coach
Thoughts on my boy, Callum Ferguson?

Glaring omission for mine

Great FC record in the last couple of years and, in his only exposure to the top level, has excelled

If SMarsh and Voges are worthy of being brought into the team in their 30s, then surely Callum is
 

adub

International Captain
Said previously that Ferg is probably close. I'd certainly have him closer to the side than Uzi atm.
 

howardj

International Coach
Word on the street is the Uzi is regarded at stodgy at the crease - a bit one paced like Watto

And also in the field

After missing last Summer, he needs to bake in the Shield oven for at least the first part of the Summer - get some FC runs on the board
 
As a New Zealand fan, I am not complaining, but given Australia's batting and bowling, I do not understand how M Marsh can bat at 6. With a new inexperienced batting line up where Warner and Smith are stars, but the remaining 3 or 4 are new to the team (including Voges to a lesser degree but it will be his first home summer), M Marsh, or Watson at 6 does appear to be a luxury.

That said, I quite like the thought of Boult bowling to M Marsh at 6 and Williamson batting to him.
 
Last edited:

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Yeah, the ShaunMarsh inclusion annoyed me too. Also how Khawaja who hasn't made a first class 50, that's right 50 in almost a year is getting ahead of Burns is beyond me.

I've been thinking about the bowling attack more lately and a part of me* thinks that it would be great for TPC (the perfect captain) to get his own side which means that Mitch Johnson would unfortunately be a casualty. I think we can build around:

young core group
Starc 25
Hazlewood 24
Pattinson 25
Cummins 22

a bit older:
Bird 28
Coulter-Nile 28

potential:
Behrendorff 25
Sandhu 22
Plus some random guy who starts the season well and I jump on his bandwagon


My new XI - a team for the present and future.

1 Bancroft 2 Warner 3 Smith 4 Burns 5 Voges 6 MMarsh 7 Nevill 8 Starc 9 Pattinson 10 Lyon 11 Hazlewood

*the other part thinks SIddle should stay in the team. Also, I'm not completely sold on Nev but can't see him not being picked for now.
Before discarding MJ you'd want to be sure he was a spent force. I'm inclined to think he might be, but I'm not sure.

Like the attack of Patto, Hazelwood and Starc. Cummins or Bird in for injuries or if Starc goes pear shaped.

Agree on Voges staying in the team for 12 mths, especially with Rogers dead set on retiring (wrong decision etc).

Do you reckon Bancroft is a shoe in?

Want Burns given opportunities over SMarsh from now on.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Before discarding MJ you'd want to be sure he was a spent force. I'm inclined to think he might be, but I'm not sure.

Like the attack of Patto, Hazelwood and Starc. Cummins or Bird in for injuries or if Starc goes pear shaped.

Agree on Voges staying in the team for 12 mths, especially with Rogers dead set on retiring (wrong decision etc).

Do you reckon Bancroft is a shoe in?

Want Burns given opportunities over SMarsh from now on.
Johnson is still capable of producing dominant spells. I just don't love the two left arm quicks together. I know they aren't identical, people like to say they are completely different, but seriously I think their attitude is similar and our bowling unit is balanced more so with just the one. Starc has outpointed Johnson this series, I'm sure if they play together this wont always be the case, but I think we have to look long-term in some instances and Johnson has already had a terrific Test career.

Bancroft is not a shoe-in. There are other candidates in Marsh, Burns, Khawaja, Watson and Cowan who can all open the batting and have more first class runs at I think a higher average than the WA opener. Agree that Burns needs opportunities over SMarsh, it looks to be starting with the ODI selection.
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
I don't know much of Bancroft, but he's been impressive based on recent scorecards. I could see a spot for Cowan at the top of the order just for stability, and if he could do a similar thing to Rogers (average 40ish with a level head) for 2 or so years that'd be good I reckon.

It'll be really interesting to see what happens with the top 6 in the next series. Pays to remember that Smith is a really young captain. Only Ian Craig and Kim Hughes have been younger than Smith when taking over Aust's captaincy full time. Really important to select guys who can support what he needs to do (maybe Cowan and Voges would be good for a while in that regard). We don't want all kids with him and Warner, but by the same token we don't want SMarsh/Watson type guys who are just inconsistent.

The next test team we put out against Bangladesh will surely be our most inexperienced top six since the Packer stuff won't it? If not more inexperienced?

Going on Nufan's prediction which is probably pretty close, we'll have under 100 tests experience in our top 7.

Warner
Bancroft
Smith
Burns
Voges
MMarsh
Nevill

This is a BIG transition period.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Yeah it is. Just on Bancroft again, I don't actually think he will debut next game. I think ShaunMarsh will play "he was unlucky in England" "next in line" "did well in West Indies" "has made runs over here before (debut ton vs SL)" "exciting talent".

Vs Bangladesh

1 Marsh (15)
2 Warner (43)
3 Smith (33)
4 Burns (2)
5 Voges (7)
6 Marsh (7)
7 Nevill (4)
8 Johnson (71)
9 Starc (22)
10 ??
11 Lyon (46)

The other spot is a lottery.
Spinning options: 1) Maxwell "performed well in ODIs" "exciting talent" 2) Agar 3) Fawad
Pace: 1) Siddle 2) Hazlewood 3) Cummins 4) Pattinson

111 Tests for the top 7, so we've got over your 100 :)
 
Last edited:

Tangles

International Vice-Captain
Cowan could offer some value short term but it seems like they are just going to use Voges as the older guy right now.

The big test will be for Smith. A young captain with a changing team batting at 3. He will have the double pressure of propping up the batting and captaining.

On MJ. I think we need to see a home summer to really know where he is at. If he can still gun it at the Gabba and WACA then he isn't done.
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
I see Ben Horne isn't impressed with Mitchell Johnson right now but its hard to see why you'd drop him. For a start he deserves his spot, he's our most experienced bowler right now, has stayed fit and is playing his next set in Australia where he becomes an exceptional player. Starc to partner him and I still favour Haze over Siddle as the 3rd seamer. He's young and having his 1st long stint in international cricket and overall has done well. Lyon obvs.

For batting I'd go Warner, Usman, Watson, Smith, Burns, Voges. Usman's recent fc record should be offset against his injury in late 2014. It pains me to bring back Watto but I reckon he has more runs in him than Marsh atm. After picking Burns as a player of the future I can't see how he can miss out now with all the retirements and failures. Voges has position over Marsh and just like howardj was sickened when he got picked by his mates in the commentary box. Screw him.

Eventually I'd like to see M Marsh come in for Watson with the idea of moving Burns to 3. Bring in Ferguson, Head or Lynn for Voges in time. Anyone of Cowan, Silk or Bancroft to keep pressure on Usman. Nevill keeps.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
Can we not be kneejerk by picking Bancroft after one good season? Remember when everyone anointed Silk as the Rogers replacement after his good year?

If he can back it up this year, sure, he's in contention. But one good FC season does not a Test opener make.
 

Top