http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/cricket-chat/77913-australian-one-day-team.htmlAustralia ODI squad for Qantas Tour of India: Aaron Finch (c), Sean Abbott, Ashton Agar, Alex Carey (vc), Pat Cummins (vc), Peter Handscomb, Josh Hazlewood, Marnus Labuschagne, Kane Richardson, Steve Smith, Mitchell Starc, Ashton Turner, David Warner, Adam Zampa
not exactly, but i think overall inconsistent johnson is better than inconsistent starc. harris and cummins are locks, and the #6 was tough between voges, hussey and watson but voges' stupid mini-career kinda stood out to me on a whim as summing up australia this decade haha.Yeah if you're taking all players at their peak (which isn't how I tend to pick teams of the decade but is clearly how you've based this one) that's definitely the team.
Why, he's been VC for ages now (helps when Aus keep picking 2 VC's).Cummins as VC is interesting.
I think official VC is something they only tend to announce when they change the offical captain. Mitch Marsh is injured (I read that he's playing the BBL game on Weds, but that he probably won't bowl in it) so he might still be it even in their minds though.Isn't MMarsh technically still the official VC, or did they decide to officially change that to Head?
He is a pretty good captain if you watch him domestically though. If he actually cemented a place in the team he'd be a great shout for next captain, but I can kind of see him treading water in and out of the side instead for a while.Its funny with Head as he looks like the 10th most influential player when we are fielding. Im placing him ahead of Burns.
I absolutely agree that Head is better than Wade but if you look at their output since Wade was brought into the side it's fair enough that the selectors think otherwise. Wade hit two tons in the Ashes and Head hasn't hit one in almost a year... and it was against Sri Lanka at home on an even roadier road than Australia usually roads (it was also his only ton).head is a good player. looks ungainly but always finds a way, and that is what counts.
it's wade who should be looking over his shoulder.
**** off he's not, assuming you are talking about Head the cricketerI absolutely agree that Head is better than Wade
Well, Head the Test/FC batsman. If I was scouting out overseas players for a league side I might take Wade because he'd keep better than Head bowls.**** off he's not, assuming you are talking about Head the cricketer
Lol, it was more about we're not far off an ATG team with 6 players in top 7 of ICC rankings and Carey already groomed to replace Paine. Add in the potential of Patterson, Pucovski, Cameron Green and the fact Renshaw and Jhye Richardson are only 23 and we may be looking at another decade of dominance soonHaha I dont think we needed the rankings to tell us this
If Wade was better he'd average more than Head, it's just blatantly obvious. To say anything else is just unhealthy and disingenuous denial.**** off he's not, assuming you are talking about Head the cricketer
And?To say anything else is just unhealthy and disingenuous denial.