Sure the Aussies sledge. But so does every other team in the world. They're just smart enough to hide it better whereas the current crop of Aussie players are not.
Its about playing and playing hard.But nowhere does it mean calling another player a "black monkey" or using other expletives.To defend such behaviour is also reprehensible.
And to propagate what effectively amounts to a rumour as the proven truth is just as bad. There was no proof that ever happened. Sure McGrath and Jayasuriya had a bit to say to each other but, if you look at the footage I have at home on video, you'll see that an umpire was well within earshot and there was never a report made.
Sometimes things on the field look worse than what they actually are too. Take the Dravid-Slater incident; fielder claims a catch, catch reversed and hell seems to break loose. Slater appears like he's abusing not just the umpire but Dravid too, yet there was no report made. Why? The footage looked bad yet the umpire, who bore the brunt of what Slater said more than Dravid, didn't see fit to report Slater. Could it be that what he was actually saying wasn't actually that bad? Who knows. Either way, that was weird that he didn't get reported, if what he was saying was so damn bad.
And before anyone jumps on me, yes he did get fined eventually but only after commenting out-of-step on radio a couple of days later. And it was the ACB which fined him for that, not the ICC.
I'm torn on this one. Incidents like the McGrath-Sarwan altercation 'look' bad but they also put the firecrackers into a game. It made the game have that much more hinging on it; not just the result but the pride of the players involved. It made pretty compelling viewing.
I've been sledged mercilessly before and have been able to ignore it. Obviously some people are more sensitive but they are just words in most sledges. That funny red thing that Brett Lee is sending down at you is going to hurt you a heck of a lot more, as it getting out.
And for those who seem to think the WI team of the 70's and 80's merely played hard, well you guys have either never seen them play or have VERY short memories. Anyone remember a firebrand by the name of Patrick Patterson? Curtly was sure prone to abuse a lot of the time and that same team sure bowled a heck of a lot more bouncers than the current Aussie team, which they were criticised for (unjustly, in my opinion). The fact of the matter is that winning and being aggressive towards your opponent in a verbal sense seem to be non mutually exclusive these days. It's the reality of professional cricket and quite frnkly, there'snothing anyone can do to stop it. Bigger fines sure won't help. If you believe they would, well then you'd believe that bigger jail sentences for drug users would help get rid of the drug problems in the world too and if you believe that, you'd believe anything.
Sledging doesn't look good. But I bet if each of you looked deep down inside of yourselves, a lot of you would have to acknowledge that the sledging keeps you watching the game. It's the same part of human nature that makes us watch Jerry Springer:
"Damn I hate that guy with a passion. Let's see what he does to offend me THIS week!"
If sledging were totally eliminated, you'd be eliminating the passion out of the game. Cricket as game which used to be played by English gentlement in village fields would be better but as a spectacle, would be all the poorer.