subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Damn Razzaq was that good...View attachment 42937
Between 1995-2000, Saqlain was arguably the best bowler on the planet in one day cricket.
Damn Razzaq was that good...View attachment 42937
Between 1995-2000, Saqlain was arguably the best bowler on the planet in one day cricket.
Because he was inferior in ODI's.why is Warnie considered so inferior in ODI's when in test him vs Murali is generally a tossup?
Warne didn't care much about the format unless it was big tournaments.Because he was inferior in ODI's.
Hence he wasn't much good in it. And Murali has a better WC record anyways.Warne didn't care much about the format unless it was big tournaments.
Don’t be that guy, move on.Murali has almost double the wickets, 2 runs lesser average and 0.32 less Economy. Most importantly, pitch difference is a much smaller issue here than Tests.
(And I commented on Warne v Murali again......)
On one hand, understandable. On the other, why?Don’t be that guy, move on.
1. Not worth the bitterness over something so small.On one hand, understandable. On the other, why?
You know, one of my biggest character weaknesses is being persuaded easily by the tiniest bit of flattery...... Alright, I will stop this.1. Not worth the bitterness over something so small.
2. You have much quality in many of your other posts, I’d much rather read more of that, personally.
Yeah Murali over Warne in ODIs is one opinion that CW has won me over on.Hence he wasn't much good in it. And Murali has a better WC record anyways.
(And I did it again...... I don't think I have learnt the lesson)