Um are you sure about that???Most people with Anglicised names or portugese or Dutch names(reflecting the three colonial rulers of Sri Lanka each for approximately 150 years at a time) in Sri Lanka have no heritage to those races nor do they have ancestry from those countries. They mostly adopted these names because it helped them get better employment or get them further than otherwise. And thats why possibly the misspelling.
Absolutely ... Most people just adopted those names.... Not because they have English blood or Dutch blood or Portugese roots in them. The De Silva's, De Zoysa's , Fonsecas, Fernando's , the Van whatevers ..Um are you sure about that???
A lot of it has to do with the fact that Dilshan can hit the ball, Arnold hardly can.How on earth is someone who doesnt even average 30, and whos recent record is equally dismal supposed to be better than Arnold? Dilshan has always had potential in test match cricket, and even there he hasnt exactly delivered, but in ODIs hes been nothing short of pathetic for years and hes played series after series for SL.
His strong technique has made him somewhat overrated IMO and plastered over his lack of runs.
Sorry to go off topic but how do we get a Jacob Martin or David Johns(t?)on play for India then?
Nonetheless all retirees who've done something of note - which Arnold undoubtedly has - deserve some sort of a mention.One was a world-beater, an all time legend and winner.
The other won't even be remembered outside of his own town in 20 years...